LLMs do typically encode a confidence level in their embeddings, they just never use it when asked. There were multiple papers on this a few years back and they got reasonable results out of it. I think it was in the GPT3.5 era though
Are you seriously comparing discrimination based on factors noone can control to a group literally defined by a choice they made? And you think that's a good faith argument?
People hate C because it's hard, people hate C++ because it truly is rubbish. Rubbish that deserved to be tried but that we've now learned was a mistake and should move on from.
You're probably looking up close at a small portion of the screen - you'll always be able to "see the pixels" in that situation. If you sit far back enough to keep the whole of the screen comfortably in your visual field, the argument applies.
Also diagnostics (errors, warnings), inlay hints like types and parameters, code lens (tiny embedded buttons), symbols, notifications like “document changed”, and more
reply