The infighting is so tedious. We really need to peacefully explore the "national divorce" idea again. In the 1860s the concept was too intermingled with the evil of slavery to be considered separately.
But realistically, instead of both sides hating each other to the point of perpetual violence, why not just have 2 or 3 countries in which we can all be happy? Trade and travel agreements are easy to establish by treaty. It doesn't have to be this way.
> We really need to peacefully explore the "national divorce" idea again. In the 1860s the concept was too intermingled with the evil of slavery to be considered separately.
The idea is still just as intermingled with fundamental human rights, plus the sides are more deeply geographically intermingled than in the 1860s, largely because the victors decided not to really root out the evil they had defeated an instead allowed it to metastasize. There may be no peaceful resolution; there is certainly no possibility of a peaceful divorce.
Because this time, the Mason-Dixon line runs through our back yards and down our neighborhood streets.
The time to split the country was when the Confederacy seceded. We should have just let them go, but that would have meant ignoring a human-rights atrocity, and in any case it would have resulted in a shared border with a belligerent enemy nation and ultimately with a failed state. It's definitely too late now.
Slavery still is—and will always be—the issue. You think the Black populations of Alabama, Louisiana, and Florida want to be ruled by uncontested white supremacists?
It is the historical task of our species to abolish slavery. In every generation we've got to reeducate ourselves about its evils.
Now that's an idea I think a lot of people can get behind. From the left, the US is a bad host. From the right, get those globalists out of my country. Everybody wins.
I'm solidly in camp 2, the "common sense" camp that doesn't care about buzzwords.
That said, I don't consider running Kafka to be a headache. I work at a mid-sized company, processing billions of Kafka events per day and it's never been a problem, even locally when I'm processing hundreds of events per day.
You set it up, forget about it, and it scales endlessly. You don't have to rewrite anything and it provides a nice separation layer between your system components.
When starting out, you can easily run Kafka, DB, API on the same machine.
Vendors frequently push that narrative so they can sell their own managed (or proprietary) solution on it. With a decent AI model (e.g ChatGPT Pro), it's easier than ever to figure out best practices and conventions.
That being said, my point is more about the organizational overhead. Deploying Kafka still means you need to learn how it works, why it's good, its configs, API, how to debug it, set up obesrvability, yada yada.
Except that the burden is on all clients to coordinate to avoid processing an event more than once since Kakfa is a brainless invention just dumping data forever into a serial log.
Do you mean different consumers within the same consumer group? There's no technology out there that will guarantee exactly-once delivery, it's simply impossible in a world where networks aren't magically 100% reliable. SQS, RedPanda, RabbitMQ, NATS... you call it, your client will always need idempotency.
This seems like one of those things some people are more sensitive to than others. To my eyes, an LCD or an OLED is just as good as e-ink for reading, except in very bright sunlight.
Do you criticize the government too much? You're now a "specified person". Sure, the court may overturn the decision eventually, but for the next 3 years your life is ruined. This is the COVID trucker protest response playbook, now applied to the internet.
If you think but I don't like the COVID truckers, well that's fine for now. Wait until there is something you vehemently disagree with the government about. Freedom of speech must be protected, regardless of how much you like the content or the speaker.
ETA: What might be the justification for censorship in this bill? The telecom network is critical infrastructure. You're spreading mis/dis/mal-information, according to the government. Therefore you are harming the integrity of the telecom network.
I've had a Moonlander and a few other ergo mechanical keyboards. I never liked them and they didn't seem to help my forearm pain as much as I hoped.
After a lot of time and well over $1,000, the 2 things that solved it for me were: (1) get a soft, membrane-style wireless keyboard and put it in my lap when I type. I've found the Logitech MX Keys to be the most comfortable. (2) Use compression arm bands when typing. They're cheap.
All-in, you're looking at about $150 for a high-comfort solution. YMMV.
But realistically, instead of both sides hating each other to the point of perpetual violence, why not just have 2 or 3 countries in which we can all be happy? Trade and travel agreements are easy to establish by treaty. It doesn't have to be this way.
reply