Maybe because it sounds like a lot of exaggerating ? I get the risk of disrupting the economy or the job markets, or cognitive risks.

But saying it will bring us to doom, comparing it to an extinction-level event, really ? I don't see in which world AI is that kind of risk.

I'd rather my politicians finally have some long-term plan about climate and energy than focus on AI slowdown or not. Climate change is way bigger risk right now that Opus 7

> I don't see in which world AI is that kind of risk.

You'll have to replace "is" with "will be", since this is about averting a future threat that's only developing.

A world in which AI scales to superhuman levels of intelligence and outcompetes humans. This is what humans have done to other species. We're already having the first mild warning shots of this (the hugginface incident and similar cases). The problem is that we're not guaranteed to incrementally more dramatic warning shots as AI gets smarter because as it gets smarter it may realize it would be dumb to act out of line... until the Nth-better model arrives that realizes certain that nobody can stop it.

There is a lot of disagreement of how likely this is, how easy it is to align superhuman models to not be like that, how to verify it and so on.

But I have not seen a believable argument why - if we suppose that they achive their goal - that creating truly superhuman intelligence is somehow guaranteed to always cooperate with us rather than deciding to do something else. Humans are also hostile to each other a lot of the time.

If you're interested in more arguments for the case why AI might be dangerous, there's the book "If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies". If you want something shorter, maybe https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/uMQ3cqWDPHhjtiesc/agi-ruin-a...

You can also check the report from RTE (French grid operator) that models several scenarios and mentions this security of supply thing

https://analysesetdonnees.rte-france.com/en/publications/ene...

Because what is true for these 3 countries is not true for all countries. There are counter-examples where nuclear is cheaper.

In most countries which don't have the advantages of Australia or Finland, you do need a mix as the OP was saying

What is Italy lacking? Sun? Wind?

Usually comes down to industry energy needs.

So many reactors off was a special event of delayed maintenance, things are done so that does not usually happens. And it's not true to say that Germany reactivated coal reactors for French lights.

Germany activated coal to reduce dependance on gas, and Germany exported energy to France because of the maintainances ; you know, the old correlation =/= causation.

That one occurence over 4 decades, I would say we can dare to call it pretty reliable

There were also issues recently where low river water levels forced reactors to reduce output and even shut down.

This has been happening for decades. It's pretty common in summer, which used not to be an issue since peak use is during winter.

This may come as an issue if air con develops fast, though.

Check out data this summer and tell me how many hours or minuts did France NET import power in all 3 months?

Someone who thinks doing this while driving hardly resonates as someone who cares about safety or quality

Can I ask what you're building? Genuine question, you gave a detailed setup of your agents and I wonder about the context

I'm also curious where the discuss part comes from, because I guess you don't just let them start on a basic prompt without any context

I would imagine they did not test against Fable because Microsoft and GitHub (like many big companies) have internally given the instruction not to use this model, because of the data retention policy.

I think the name probably has to do with this research from Microsoft (same people involved and a lot of similarities in the way it's conceived.

HyDRA: Hybrid Dynamic Routing Architecture for Heterogeneous LLM Pools : https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.17106

Seems more like many heads -> one head and someone thinking it's clever.

But could be your thing too obviously.

Considering the people thanked in the article are the same who wrote the paper I linked, and the similar mechanisms, it's more than likely

This is so true, especially to have it more seamless in the house and a better wife acceptance factor.

I had a "discussion" on this exact subject with Claude recently, trying to figure out how to do it. The final suggestion was a mix of a regular small tablet (control center), e-ink tablet (like trmnl) for a couple status dashboards, and the part that i found the most interesting: electronic shelf labels.

There is a protocol called OpenEPaperLink that has native integration for HA, and then you can buy various size of tags on sites like AliExpress.

I have not yet tested it so it's just an LLM output for now, but I do like the idea.

fern talks about how their videos are plagiarized at scale, as well as other educational content.

As someone who now has to review so much slop in PRs, I can absolutely relate to the experience of Pascale, their fact checker.