This should actually be fine, no different than any other web server

You can keep the git folder in your machine, then use sshfs to mount the remote into your directory where: project-root -.git/ -code/ <= remote/code

This way you don't have to give git access to the potentially unsafe server. Git hook attacks are still possible so disable those by defaultç

This is an unusual folder structure but works fine, let me know if there is anything iffy

That's a clever and intriguing idea. I have to think through the security implications a bit though - I don't actually know much about how git operates with regards to hooks etc.

I'd imagine you lose the ability to have the coding agent do the commits for you? E.g. if you just mount the code directory, then an agent running on the remote side can't commit anything, right?

So you'd have to mount the .git directory from the remote side to then push?

git will check the .git folder, find a hook, and run it where it is applicable. If you are cloning a remote repository may inherit you with malicious hooks. These hooks run before you git operations, for example it is useful if you want lint the code a certain way before pushing, it does it automatically.

You can disable this behavior globally. Yes, the agent should have no git access this way, however you could always do a local sub repository if you want to. You track your changes twice, but should work

nice one, discovered a trick where holding space space while holding left or right allows side stepping.

Most people who spend time in front of a keyboard should without effort should attain 60 words per minute naturally. With decent techniques, you can go up to 80 wpm. Now there are speed typers who can do 250 wpm. Can you really think meaningfully at that speeds, in a way that it can be understood and is useful ?

At that point one could argue that running your own server to get instant responses from your llm matters, while we are at it, compile times, tests, search queries, could always use be shaved some milliseconds per.

With speed reader tools I can comfortably read and understand 500 wpm, should we now switch to speed readers since we read code more often than we write it ?

No, in reality, you create software faster when the code you write the first time doesn't result in errors, which requires knowledge of your stack.

Even if you are not looking to read your code, LLMs also benefit from good programming practices, some of these programming practices should produce code which is clear, changeable and extendable

Nvidia has done it before, I think they included a virus in their data which encrypted the stolen data

I looked into it, looks like they attempted to counter-attack. [1]

1.https://videocardz.com/newz/nvidia-allegedly-hacked-the-rans...

okay that is kinda funny and much less legally problematic (because they didn't actively hack back and depending on what that virus did in detail could be seen more like how money bags can spray color on the bills if forcefully opened making them useless but not quite destroying them)

reminds me of those 2010's flash games, absolutely amazing

Thanks!

I am not really an ml dev so I don't understand most of it. It does sound ridiculous how it would even work work. Brilliant work and great article I enjoyed reading it

This sounds similar to the Kimi's mixture of experts architecture if I understood it correctly(likely I have not), can you comment on this ?

No worries, happy to discuss anyway :)

MoE (mixture of experts), is an architecture that forces sparsity (not all 'neurons' are active during the forward pass.

This is pretty much orthogonal to that; it works with dense and MoE models, by repeating 'vertical' sections of the transformer stack.

>forces sparsity

That's branching and then coalescing, right? It selects a path that is weighted as being most beneficial to the input?

Given you pointed out how even the vertical part of the architecture allows for skipping layers anyway, isn't that essentially the same thing?

Time limit is brutal, couldn't do it without some googling, but managed to find an Irish flag in Paris at the Irish embassy. Fun premise for a game. I can see myself playing this with friends.

First play through I found the difficulty a bit much, but I think some geowizards will disagree

thanks for playing!

I hear you on the difficultly, and appreciate the feedback. It will be a tough balance to strike since, as you say, there are some Street View wizards out there in the GeoGuessr community.

I will definitely try to mix in easier rounds.

zoom out on new branches is too disrupting.

I like it for idea exploration

Something for adding details under a branch could be nice

Thanks for the feedback blourvim! I'm continuing to work on the interaction flow--- agree it is jarring to zoom in and out. I'm trying to arrange the current path more clearly on the screen. Good idea also with adding details or even links. Especially when you go deeper into the map, it could be nice to have notes attached as a sort of summary of the map. Will let you know once these have been resolved.

The sound lines are pretty funny, reminds me of age of empires 3

Glad you like them! :)