Do you play padel in Sweden? There was a big oversupply of courts, powered by bad expectations and venture capital. Things have scaled down, but I heard it is still very popular. Am I wrong?
2/ Good balance between being still athletic (you have to run), while not punish less-fit players a lot.
3/ Social component. In Portugal you must get a beer after each match. Suddenly you have 100+ friends and a shared interest.
4/ Full gradient between 'funny dumb ass game with friends with no experience' to 'professional competitive sport'. With a lot of options in between like beginners games, clubs events, amateur leagues and semi/pro tournaments.
5/ The game is more tactical, that athletic. After you get initial technical background, you start to play more 'chess' than 'overpower opponent' style.
6/ Good business. More people on less space = more revenue. More social = more spending in a bar. Coaching is more profitable as well (groups of 4).
7/ Open to all social groups. My wife is playing female-only tournaments. We play mixed tournaments together.
I play padel for 3 years, played tennis for year, tried squash and badminton.
1/ KYC is pricey, and users might not want to pay for it
2/ Spammer can hire real people to farm accounts
I think this idea might work if we
- create reputation graph, where valuable contributors vote for others and spread reputation
- users can fine-tune their reputation graph, so instead of "one for all", user can have his personal customized graph (pick 30 authorities and we will rebuild graph from there)
I think apps that want assurance of your identity should pay for your kya. They want valuable people after all, and this should go into their CAC. Users still pay nothing, the identity service does not care about their info, after verification, it drops any details, like uploaded documents, whatever, keeps a certificate.
The cost for this service is likely keeping up with ID systems for multiple countries, infra and support.
Potentially, if this is made into a protocol, it can be decentralized kind of like the SSL system, so each country manages it's own rules.
I can imagine a "anonymity" or "reputation" filter attached to every interaction in the internet. Enabled by default, but you can disable safe mode and see bots having fun.
Also for me problem is not in the anonymity itself, but in the lack of reputation. If I have a signal that entity can be trusted, I don't care much about its real identity.
I think this is a great way to frame the conversation and possible solution: reputation. things like accumulated karma or credits and IRL connections (big data will love this) all begin to feel dystopian whereas reputation I believe is something that everybody can get behind. It can absolutely remain anonymous, while still benefiting from IRL meetups for big reputation bumps (just use your handle). We all hang out in lots of places online, let that rep build and be used everywhere. Pretty sure they were trying to do something like this in the fedverse but haven't touched base on it in a long time ...
And others pull regularly from the pool? how are knowledge and skills continuously updated? I was thinking these necessarily need to be server side (like the main project under discussion) for it to be non-clunky for many users, but potentially git could work?
Like, let's take a company example - gitlab. If an agent had the whole gitlab handbook, then it'll be very useful to just ask the agent what and how to do in a situation. The modern pi agents can help build such a handbook with data fed in all across the company.
reply