It’s more likely to encourage the war against open source.
Come on, tell me you haven’t noticed there’s a secret war brewing to supplant open source.
The day shall come when we may no longer “view source”, where open source licenses and their code repositories are no longer prominent.
There will be business news articles about how lucky you are, the safety of your children and the well being of your communities, all due to responsible companies “making sure” their source codes are safe and well looked after by professionals.
You think it’s too big to fail (OSS), yet it is common to miscalculate the consequences of over leveraging public perception, let alone their sentiments for security where appetites are concerned.
In a world where sources are no longer free, we will all be made “pirates”, you will see.
> Hello guys,
We would like to inform you that we have decided to shut down our site.
The past 2 years have been very difficult for us - some of the people in our team died due to covid complications,
others still suffer the side effects of it - not being able to work at all.
Some are also fighting the war in Europe - ON BOTH SIDES.
Also, the power price increase in data centers in Europe hit us pretty hard.
Inflation makes our daily expenses impossible to bare.
Therefore we can no longer run this site without massive expenses that we can no longer cover out of pocket.
After an unanimous vote we've decided that we can no longer do it.
We are sorry :(
Bye
And then there is that guy that points out the conspiracy to supplant every suspicion that nefarious actors plot against the unsuspecting masses of all others.
There are conspirators against your natural destinies. From profiteers looting government and the populous to secret social and political interests who thrive in the shadow of your refusal to believe.
Incredulity, self assurances, and an indulgent delusion of normalcy obscure and protect these conspiracies.
You are not the America you think you are, you are the America thought controlled.
All “conspiracy theories” are actually false-flag PsyOps, designed and deployed to keep the highly suspicious and intuitive distracted, while the actual conspiracies go unnoticed! (/s)
So separately is LLM capable of discerning and manipulating Truth? No, not alone.
Humans are not innately truthful. However we may learn and embody principles, of which may be those of truthfulness.
Our technology must undergo this same process of self deception as we ourselves have not (collectively) figured out.
The Truth is the perturbation of Objective Reality (state’s collapse in the moment of now.) the “truth” is a figment of minds. Integrity is the measure in between.
As certainty is truly impossible, determination must come by the least uncertain resolve.
Consider that there are plausibly four representations of truthieness.
- pro-presumptive-truth
- a-presumptive-truth
- actualized-truth
- falsified-truth
The two former might be considered non-terminal yet representative (actuating bias explicitly), and the latter as terminal (mappings to discrete state resolutions.)
Now, ask yourself, can you tell the difference when you hear bullshit or important shit from another human?
That blasted corpratocracy which feeds upon our dreams has buckled.
The trend has pulled a groin, over reach you see.
There is an inevitability which crests all our minds.
Until some charger sets fourth a realm for us all to co-identify, we shall remain divided. And each into their own “verse.”
We should be grateful, for what we have so far. Better to see dreams come true in their own time than to be built by those who would contrive them as their own.
> a mass migration of humanity to a new cognitive frontier
Yes, something is happening yet I don’t see the relevant causes or consequences exposed.
There is a self of “super-consciousness” which is our fullest, activated selves. And there is the ordinary relaxed, idle, soon to atrophy part of ourselves.
The new cognitive frontier is an obligation of each mind obtaining it, as much as developed physical properties. Only future generations of those who have elevated cognitive fulfillment will inherit this advance. All others will struggle and compete in the den of ignorance and confusion, just as we have until now.
Too few elevated pathfinders come of age quickly enough to stand out in a cacophony of modernity. The individual mass is simply too self absorbed. The mass gamification has denatured some part of us.
If you would fulfill your potential of being, cognitive and all, vast time of enduring intention (of whatever you yourself wills to embody) is required. Three years to be more than incompetent and less than a liability. Ten years to be competent in saying they know the challenges of their own nature. A lifetime of tiny increments which are not necessarily reflected by the distraction of material are imperative.
Our technology and consumertopia is not an antithesis, rather a distraction from realizing we and our minds are the ultimate technology. A technology most of humanity never fully appreciates.
> Such a shift may well be enabled by artificial intelligence, as can be speculatively explored
Doubtful.
If modern AI grants you insight, that is well enough. The true intelligence is our own, and by deliberate decades our thought structure and strategy may excel, or rot as a useless self indulgent orgy of senses.
> regarding the apparent absence of ET contact with humanity
I disagree. I believe there have been “others” here the whole time (beyond written human history). Humans are so arrogant to think they must live as we do, or share our values. These interact with our world through their minds. They mostly live their entire lives in organic fluid filled sacks.
As their technology is of the mind (working through entanglement, as we are quantum consciousness), they do not need “things”, though when they do, they can grow it atom by atom.
They do not have “computers”, they use their minds, and technology augmentations for everything.
> framed by them as committed to an overly primitive style of communication.
Yes. Unless one is very good with words, talking is a poor medium. Every sense, experience, thought, or idea may be communicated as fully as one’s own memory or imagination.
How might this influence or structure advanced mediums of thought?
Better to be an ascetic lean living minimalist in study of the self than successful and busy by modern standards.
> Metadiscourse
Enlightening coloring of the casual yet consequential. This epic could have been broken into a half dozen separate discourse (LLM?)
I must admit, long before “Bohmian dialogue” I suspected LLM. Nearing intellectual hodgepodge, I pressed on.
> Magical communication
Yes, now we’re getting to it. We are not alone in our own minds. Our minds may be linked through entanglement, and entire secret cultures exists among us implicated in this revelation. Maybe so would “ET’s”. Yes, hmmm.
> Given the deprecation of "magical thinking" as pseudoscientific
It is by no accident. Those empowered by thought control do not want their powers explained, and ordinary people do not want to consider their implications.
The remainder is very interesting incoherence (all the references are excellent!)
The speculation regarding “ET” communications present the valid points that there really isn’t much to say (they likely know plenty of us.) everyone knows humans are unreliable, unpredictable, and prone to harming others over their ideals.
Humanity has an inborn mystery of thought controls needing an account before otherworldly matters may by any integrity be resolved.
There is a lecture series “Astronomy, Stars, Galaxies, and the Universe” by James Kaler which is quite excellent.
Recorded Books has the Modern Scholar Series, which one might obtain through their local library. It’s an audio, not literally a book, though the quality is excellent and may answer many questions (like how is sunlight made?)
As for quantum considerations, try the book “fabric of the universe”, by David Deutsch. And there is always Alice in Quantumland if you want to “go down the rabbit hole” so to speak.
Come on, tell me you haven’t noticed there’s a secret war brewing to supplant open source.
The day shall come when we may no longer “view source”, where open source licenses and their code repositories are no longer prominent.
There will be business news articles about how lucky you are, the safety of your children and the well being of your communities, all due to responsible companies “making sure” their source codes are safe and well looked after by professionals.
You think it’s too big to fail (OSS), yet it is common to miscalculate the consequences of over leveraging public perception, let alone their sentiments for security where appetites are concerned.
In a world where sources are no longer free, we will all be made “pirates”, you will see.