The two layers seem to say, superimposed on each other:

Manny doubles back to the car, reaches into Olivia's pile of flowers and finds his gun, the one he'd left there. Something really does go down like in Heat, and he's dead. All right then… I don't hate it. No matter. Ouch!

Manny doubles back to the car, reaches into Olivia's pile of flowers and finds his gun, the… Maybe the really cool thing that happens is you see his shadow traveling through time, and that's how you know he's coming back. And although I'm pretty cool with it… Great ending, ta da.

Have there ever been sections of this that the community would consider "solved"? If not, these seem less like logic puzzles and more like complete nonsense...

Cool! Enclitic -que should _not_ be broken off as a separate word, though.

That plus the spaces between punctuation makes it clear it's done for tokenization, but nothing puts it back together again.

That "Stocks" icon is bizarre -- imagine a stocks app where the marker indicating the queried position on a trendline actually had that superfluous refraction effect on it.

"Ova Sfongia Ex Lacte" seems like a typo of a recipe that originated here (https://historicalitaliancooking.home.blog/english/recipes/a...) and spread around the Internet.

Agreed. I started from this article a few years ago, and was frustrated enough by:

> So that means, while I know what it does, I don't really know how, since all the work is in that mysterious function.

that I spent the time to work it out myself. (answer: It arises from discretising the Laplacian -- 6 is the number of direct neighbours in 3D)

The genus of the seahorse is _Hippocampus_.

And the fact that a transformer model can't distinguish between the two in the context of the sentence given is a point against the general nature of the intelligence.

We are at the point where "don't add seahorses" doesn't actually fill it with seahorses like the previous models.

This guy prompts. Insanely astute.

I wish it were possible to link to a particular page (e.g. the optics simulation).

For starters, a Chinese language which preserves final stops (-p, -t, -k) would be a better choice (e.g. Cantonese). These disappear completely in Mandarin, leaving rhymes (the vowel + final consonant) underspecified or ambiguous in many cases.

Don’t give them any ideas… https://taxheaven3000.com/

I refuse to believe that's a real thing. Seems like something you'd see in a Paul Verhoeven movie.