Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | imglorp's commentslogin

Monthly what now? Daily would be more accurate.

There were 25 incidents in January and 15 in December.


Starlink yes, at 480 km LEO. But the article says "put AI satellites into deep space". Also if you think about it, LEO orbits have dark periods so not great.

A better orbit might be Sun Synchronous (SSO) which is around 705 km, still not "deep space" but reachable for maintenance or short life deorbit if that's the plan. https://science.nasa.gov/earth/earth-observatory/catalog-of-...

And of course there are the LaGrange points which have no reason to deorbit, just keep using the old ones and adding newer.


Nineteen years ago. Nothing has changed.

Hurd Uses Repurposed Debian

To be fair, GNU/Linux distros like Debian lean very heavily on the GNU part. They owe a lot to the GSF and its work is highly praised.

Just their kernel somehow seems to be stuck in vaporware status. Probably because a lot of developers would think "why work on this when we already have Linux" which is a fair point too.


I wonder if microkernels more relevant now than ever given their reduced attack surface, and also the recent availability of more cores.

One big criticism from decades ago was the loss in efficiency. But what's changed since microkernels were conceived is how many processor cores are available to offload userspace drivers from the kernel.

Is this a valid viewpoint? Is it time for microkernels to overtake monolithic kernels?


They already did. There are more microkernels around than monolithic. All big CPU's use them internally, all phones use them.

> still failing to communicate out of band.

I don't understand countries or operators that do this.

There's no secrets about hardware position and orbit. Even amateur astronomers can track spacecraft.

There's no benefit to trashing orbit from failure to coordinate and cooperate. Any collision in LEO will deny it to everyone for several years.

So who is being insular and why is it to their advantage?


It's about trust and empowerment.

It's about hiring adults, respecting and trusting them to do the job and support the team, and be responsible for their methods. The details are not important to that goal.

If an employer instead treats people like toddlers needing supervision, spoon feeding, and metrics around methods, not work, they will get only that.


It's literally "we the people, by the people, for the people". Except for personnel/employee matters, state and local government should be completely transparent with secrets explicitly forbidden.

Secret deals with corporations is corruption.


The US passed the Chips act in 2022. Is there really nobody reaching for those billions ready to crank out some memory four years later?



The idea behind the CHIPS act made some sense, but with these monkeys in charge (and the voters who elected them), no one has any idea what's going to happen next week, next month, next year, or over the next 10 years. It turns out that predictable, consistent, and coherent trade policy is actually fucking important. Who would have guessed?

Can we agree academia is the worst system, except for all the others?

In the last century, the US led so many tech fields because of both academic and corporate research and the people to do it. Let's fix that system if needed and keep it well stocked.

The alternative is ignorance, leading to unskilled industries and an easily misled electorate.


10k PhDs lost isn't a step in the direction of fixing anything, though. There is little to no evidence that the people leaving aren't the top performers, let alone the bottom.

> There is little to no evidence that the people leaving aren't the top performers, let alone the bottom.

According to the article, the majority of the losses were voluntary (people quitting or accepting buyout offers) and not people who were directly laid-off.

While this isn't direct evidence of where these people sit on the spectrum from top to bottom performers, my anecdotal life experience suggests that when losses like this are voluntary its far more likely they are top performers who have plenty of options elsewhere (either in the private sector, or in other governments).

Also (and also anecdotally) this brain-drain doesn't just apply to direct government workers. I know of several people who worked in (and in some cases headed up) prestigious university research labs in the US who have left in the last year after massive funding cuts. Most of them were immigrants who went back to universities in their country of origin, some after having been here for decades.


At least amongst my circles, that seems so obvious. I don’t know what things are actually like on the ground. But from here in Australia, the subtext of all the ICE news is that foreigners are no longer welcome in the US. And that America is becoming an authoritarian, fascist state.

Of course I don’t want to visit the US. There’s no way I’d want to move there right now.

I know of multiple US run conferences which are taking place in Europe this year. Too many attendees wouldn’t come if they were hosted in the US.


> At least amongst my circles, that seems so obvious

Blindingly obvious.

The long-term (very likely permanent in many cases) damage being done to America by the Trump administration through brain-drain, weakening of our own economy, and causing the entire rest of the world to (rightfully) distrust us as a reliable ally and/or trading partner is incalculable.

And it is all pure unforced error driven by a malignant narcissist bent on retribution who is also seemingly being used by a few different actors with their own individual axes to grind as he slips into dementia.

> But from here in Australia, the subtext of all the ICE news is that foreigners are no longer welcome in the US. And that America is becoming an authoritarian, fascist state.

This is also how it feels in the US. (And it isn't only foreigners -- the message is also that "the wrong kind" of American citizens are also no longer welcome in the US)


There's reason to suspect that the one's leaving are more likely to be top performers. First, top performers are the most likely to be able to find another job easily so they would take the voluntary buyout or just leave when things get crazy. Also, some of the DOGE cuts targeted probationary employees which include those that have recently been promoted or recently hired, both are classes of employee that the department explicitly wanted to keep.

Wouldn't an easily misled electorate benefit the political party that lies the most?

We have definitive proof of that viz a vis, trump and his idiot magats.

That is kind of my point. That party has been attacking the education system in all forms for decades (imo) for exactly that reason. They have razed everything from school lunches to loan programs. This affects everyone.

Academia critics usually think it was pretty great until the last 3-5 decades.

Yes, they may want a full on Tiananmen every day in every blue city. Suppressing dissent is the end goal; hurting brown people is only a warmup. If the public actually starts to fight back, the Insurrection Act has already been threatened.

This is a good point. Even if you don't like brown people or (illegal) immigrants the Republicans won't stop here.

Anyone who isn't a white Christian male is a second class citizen.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: