Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | isatty's commentslogin

I know exactly one person who has a foldable phone and I live in sf. I’ve never even considered getting one and I like new tech.

I’m not doubting that there’s demand for it but I wonder who/where?


I’m not doubting that there’s demand for it but I wonder who/where?

I spend a lot of time in hospitals, and I see doctors with them.

That may also explain why Apple isn't too worried about the price.


> I know exactly one person who has a foldable phone and I live in sf.

If we're comparing anecdotes, when I lived in the states far from sf many tech people I knew had folding phones. They loved them and I was curious, but I like iOS.


All over China/Asia, anecdotal statistic

It’s 8G of data in memory. You can raw dog that no problem.

(Indexes would be nice though)


Yep, I do the same. There’s no reason for the tv to do anything smart. It exists to display appletv and ps5.


What on earth is an Omarchy


Officially omakase (clueless chef decides your menu with security issues) and arch linux.

The fact that it is almost an anagram of monarchy is probably a plus for DHH.


> The fact that it is almost an anagram of monarchy is probably a plus for DHH.

I spend way too much time online; but it's good to know I am not this terminally online.


Thank you! Sounds horrible.

I don’t know what a DHH is though, probably not important.


The guy who invented Ruby on Rails. He’s been pretty important in web dev and he’s an excellent engineer, although he’s a polarizing figure. He’s always been opinionated and never afraid to ruffle some feathers. More recently, he’s been posting some controversial right-wing stuff online that pissed off a lot of people.


You realize you are exemplary hater when you feel an urge to post comments like this


You are absolutely right and I'll have Claude read a ChatGPT summary of Paul Graham's hater essay!


Nvidia is indeed a terrible company when it comes to open source, etc. however, as someone who has been gaming on desktop hardware since the 6xxx card days, Nvidia hardware has always worked. I switched to Linux full time since the 2XX days (maybe it was the 280 gtx?) and never had a lot of the problems everyone else got on Linux (using only the closed source drivers).


Likewise, their hardware has been rock solid and very performant for me. I bought most of my current setup second hand and they've been going strong for years now.


NVIDIA introduced programs like The Way It's Meant to be Played, optimizing major game titles specifically for NVIDIA architecture, which made competitions like AMD cards underperform in critical releases.

I'm old enough to remember.


I fail to see how this is a problem?

AMD could’ve done the same.


Amd and Intel have the same programs.


But they don't/didn't have the same level of market share as Nvidia, particularly in the PC gaming market. Nvidia had 65%-85% market share, and still worked with game studios to make sure their competitions failed. That's the opposite of good stewardship that's all I'm saying.


You are being disingenuous.

They worked with studios to optimize games for their hardware. I don’t think they went around sabotaging other companies hardware. They did what was good for them.

Why did competition not do the same?


Can I run a fp8 quant with 96gb VRAM?


Only VRAM? Unlikely unless you can also load the whole model into regular RAM. The previous 3.5 release was 250gb at BF16, so FP8 would likely be around 125gb. Your best best is FP4/Q4.


Very sad. I try not to go below q8.


People who say stuff like that are unhinged chronically online trolls. Best not to feed them.


Not even close to the same level as China.

What’s up with whitewashing China on all online platforms these days? You, on hacker news, should know better.


There are people being arrested for being in Signal chats where non violent protests are being discussed. People being arrested for carrying water bottles. ICE is shooting people who are not even in the way, just making noise across the street. Rubio called the DSA a terrorist organization.

And second, I don't think I said "at the same level as China". It can be the case that both countries are authoritarian and punishing dissidents. And still be the case that China is worse.


> Not even close to the same level as China.

Have you been paying attention? At all?

The US is really trying to cut off its own legs and branding it as removing unnecessary weight. Give it time, we'll get there.


Yeah I'm wondering the same thing. It's bizarre and unsettling and seems off-brand for HN.


The left is having it's Tea Party/MAGA movement, it's only going to get worse for the foreseeable future.


Isn’t the answer just: money?


Considering another FP today about AI and ‘leadership’, perhaps it’s more on point to say that AI promotes Manager jobs, and Managers are writing manifestos about how Managers are the future of society. Yeah, money’s a factor, but if we lived in a world with replicators, a class that values itself for delegation would still be promoting AI for how it enables delegation without the tediousness of workers.


I think they just realize their job (at least at the middle level) could near entirely be replaced by AI being fed tickets and company emails by an intern


Not so much! Management is effort that needs to be contributed, and I think a lot of the engineering community division we're seeing around AI stems from "Do you enjoy management?". Either you do, in which case AI is a godsend, or you do not, in which case AI is a tire fire — but in both cases, the outcome stems from AI needing to be managed in order to be effective.

Middle managers exist to handle the day-to-day management of workers, so that leadership don't have to keep context-shifting between 'manage the organization' and 'manage the workers'. Today, AI is currently only able to replace workers. If, someday, AI can manage itself without direction and without costing exorbitant amounts per week to do so, then yes: middle managers will see the same work catastrophe served upon them by upper managers.

This also highlights that 'AI manager' is perhaps the most sought-after role in software engineering right now, except that workers aren't being demanding or being offered a manager's salary. Big win versus labor for corporations there, especially if they can normalize middle managers taking a career-wide pay cut while everyone is excited about AI :)


And attention or admiration.

Maybe they feel like, for once in their lives, they can appear as intelligent as the people they employ with AI propping up their prose.


This is spectacular marketing.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: