131 lines and about 10% of them are the title/copyright banner. Genuinely impressive in it's terseness

Nearly a quarter of it is checking for necessary prerequisites, too.

You might be out of luck: I believe they expire unused after a fairly short time.

100% of anything is a bad idea if you're going to have to draw on them any time soon. Bonds are less volatile than equity, but they're still subject to drops in value.

Sure, but a mistake I often see is people thinking that people's entire retirement savings is needed on the first day of retirement. People can and should still be invested in equities even in retirement, it's just the percentage is less depending on age and burn rate.

Indeed, we have just been through arguably the largest (nominal) drawdown in the history of fixed income.

Well quite. But that means that to the extent that most people know anything about grok, it's as "that twitter AI that called itself Hitler and made naked pictures of children".

All it really shows is that the British court system will sell you all the justice that money can buy.

> There's a popular hundred+ million view, often reposted and requoted, tweet about this

Retweet it all you want, but it won't make it any more true.

It reduces risk for employers by piling it onto employees, who are also probably in a worse position to bear it.

Arguably this is the reason it should be borne by the government, not companies. This is one option https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexicurity

The original post (and correct link) is here: <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48725917>

So you're so utterly convinced they're lying about this because....

The same way you monitor your staff's work in general? Do they not have goals and deadlines and some way to discuss their progress with their manager?