Big difference though is that in the UK these cameras are publically owned, and the data feeds into a publically owned ANPR database. Whereas Flock cameras are owned by flock and all the ANPR records are stored on their own infrastructure
I don’t believe Flock cameras are used anywhere in the UK?
Pretty much all public cctv cameras that are installed on the side of public roads, like Flock are in the US, are publically owned, either by Police forces, Local Councils or National highways.
Craig Newmark (Craigslist) and Jimmy Wales (Wikipedia) come to mind, both founders could have made platfoms that would have been ad-ridden (and made a boat full of cash) but the founders chose not to
I think we can all agree the "ads" on CL are not even close to the same ballpark as the offerings of ad tech. Like to conflate the two as the same would be the most disingenuous bit of logic that I'd be embarrassed if I were the one to have made it.
If you are EU based (or other equivalent country with decent data protection laws) there may be a GDPR complaint with them not deleting your data after closing your account under the right to be forgotten
yeah but the link states "The 20 million user conversations were randomly sampled from Dec. 2022 to Nov. 2024" so this makes no sense. 2024 was much longer than 30 days ago
i'm unique in their dataset on firefox on a 2k monitor.
looks like my main culprits: useragent, timezone (lol), navigator properties (99.9% unique,) fonts, canvas (100% unique,) screen dimensions (available and .. actual?). all of these showed >99% unique.
I wouldn't read too much into that site. For instance it says my chrome browser, updated to latest version has a user-agent "similarity ratio" (whatever that means) of 0.43%. This can't possibly be true because autoupdate is enabled by default for chrome, so you'd expect everyone to have the user-agent, or at least all the windows users to have the same user-agent. For whatever reason it also thinks firefox has a 37.8% market share, which is clearly not correct. I also tested some phones, which it also claims is "unique". That clearly can't be the case either. Phones are pretty basically run the same software/hardware, and are pretty locked down from a customization/sandboxing perspective, so at the very least you'd expect most of the iPhone 15 in New York to have the same fingerprint, for instance. It certainly shouldn't single any one out as "unique".
reply