Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | mberning's commentslogin

Interfaces used to be “battle ship grey” which I loved.

Total capitulation by Apple.


  > There were a few moments I put  my hand into my pocket to take out my phone to look up something I was curious about. My phone wasn’t there.
My dad smoked for decades and when he tried to quit his hand would instinctively go to his pocket dozens of times a day.

That is the level that smartphone addiction is on. Literally ruining peoples lives.


I am fully in support of the dumb smartphone hybrid.


I never found Bundler to be all that slow compared to other package managers.


Rails 8.1 and ruby 3 are also very surprisingly fast, and coming back to an “omakase” framework is honestly a breath of fresh air especially now that with AI tools you can implement a lot of stuff from scratch instead of using deps.


I wouldn't say it stands out as being unusually slow, but it certainly isn't snappy.


I am so exhausted by reviewing the AI slop from other “developers”. For a while I was trying to be a good sport and point out where it was just wrong or doing things that were unnecessary or inefficient. I’m at the point of telling people to not bother using an AI. I don’t have the time or energy to deal with it. It’s like a missile defense system that costs a million dollars to intercept but the incoming projectile cost $10 for your adversary. It’s not sustainable.


I am amazed that people take Hal Puthoff at his word that he has worked on all these secret projects for decades even though he cannot describe in definitive terms what the actual outcomes of those programs were. But he is able to talk about them for hours in the vaguest terms possible. How is that even possible. I mean I worked for an aerospace company for 5 years and could go into great and boring detail about what I did while I was there. But all these people supposedly worked on things much more exotic and can’t remember anything. This is the greatest psyop of all time.


> I am amazed that people take Hal Puthoff at his word that he has worked on all these secret projects for decades even though he cannot describe in definitive terms what the actual outcomes of those programs were.

This is one hundred perfect my view on this, and things are more than suspicious when suddenly being asked to get into the weeds on some technical aspect these guys start citing national security to keep things vague.


Why is it surprising that they can’t talk about it in concrete terms given “ all these people supposedly worked on things much more exotic”?


Because talk is cheap, but when pressed, a crackpot like Puthoff cannot provide a single relevant detail. Had he been involved in actual top secret projects, he would shut up about them; instead he fantasizes.

He also has a history of quackery, belief in the paranormal, and being duped by Uri Geller.

I mean, he's the worst kind of crackpot: a sucker who believes magic tricks are real and will evangelize about it.


You didn't answer the question, you just went on another one of your rants. Why is it surprising that he can’t talk about it in concrete terms given “ all these people supposedly worked on things much more exotic”?


I did answer, but I realize arguing with parapsychology believers is a fool's errand.

Puthoff is a crank. Of course he won't provide evidence of participating in top secret projects that produced any results: he doesn't have it. He can only speak in the vaguest terms typical of pseudoscience cranks.


Also it would be very easy to proof that it really works. Instead they remain vague. They remind me of the dropship sales boys, that mainly sell courses on how to dropship instead of dropshipping themselves.

If you find a believer they will worship you with no hard questions.


To me the more insidious problem is that we have juniors now that aren’t learning much because they lean on AI for everything. They are behind the curve.


He’s a fascinating guy, but this is not an announcement. It’s a teaser of a teaser.


He's showing the trailer tomorrow for the Game Awards!


For $200 how many casual pirates does it have to dissuade to pay for itself. Not many. At that price it doesn’t need to be very good.


Technically, it needs to dissuade pirates who then go spend money on the software legitimately.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: