if i understood correctly, you dont kubernetes, rights? Did you consider it?

I do every day.

I dont write just code, i do as well network engineering, network architecture. There is stuff that, at least until now, i cannot vibe.

I have a pet project where I dont use AI. It moves slowly but, to code, is my hobby.

Even Acre, the brazilian Bielefeld, has a startup!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bielefeld_conspiracy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acre_conspiracy

some startups are already avoiding the open source route, exactly because of that. You publish your code, then 2 weeks later, we have dozen of "$PROJ in $LANG rewritten". 30000 LOC + super verbose README.md done in one week, in less than 10 commits, from somebody that never wrote a single line of OSS.

Yes, it will kill open source—at least as we know it.

I’m convinced that GitHub and GitLab will eventually stop offering their services for free if the flood of low-quality, "vibe-coded" projects—complete with lengthy but shallow documentation—continues to grow at the current rate.

The trend of rewriting existing programs ("vibe-coding" a rewrite of $PROG in Rust, for example) threatens to undermine important, battle-tested projects like SQLite. As I described in this comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46821246.

I’m quite sure developers will increasingly close-source their work and black-box everything they possibly can. After all, source code that cannot be seen cannot be so easily "rewritten" by vibe-coders.

a blog not written by AI, about a project written in AI. It is just matter of time. We just need AI to read the article, and then the full circle is complete.

vibe-coding everything in Rust, you mean.

So the idea is to rewrite it in Rust and drop SQLite? I mean, maybe that’s just how things evolve. But it feels like every project is only a few vibe-coding sessions away from getting rewritten in $LANGUAGE. And I can’t help wondering whether that’s hurting a sustainable open-source ecosystem.

SQLite is a good example: the author built a small ecosystem around it and managed to make a living from open source. Thanks to author's effort, we have a small surface area, extreme stability, relentless focus on correctness.

If we keep rewarding novelty over stewardship, we’ll lose more “SQLite-like” projects—stable cores that entire ecosystems depend on.

> Cybersecurity monitoring systems then reportedly flagged the uploads in early August. That triggered a DHS-led damage assessment to determine whether the information had been exposed.

So it means, a DLP solution, browsers trusting its CA and it silently handling HTTP in clear-text right?