Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | pezgrande's commentslogin

aren't most of them being payed by big corps? Redhat, Google, Microsoft... you name it.

I am pretty sure not most of them. In something like linux, that is the case, but I think there are so many other projects that barely receive financial or any other kind of support

does any distro uses clang? I thought all linux kernels were compiled using gcc.


Chimera does, it also has a FreeBSD userland AFAIU.

https://chimera-linux.org/


hm this one is interesting. Thanks for sharing!


https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/kbuild/llvm.html

> The Linux kernel has always traditionally been compiled with GNU toolchains such as GCC and binutils. Ongoing work has allowed for Clang and LLVM utilities to be used as viable substitutes. Distributions such as Android, ChromeOS, OpenMandriva, and Chimera Linux use Clang built kernels. Google’s and Meta’s datacenter fleets also run kernels built with Clang.


Not a Linux distro, but FreeBSD uses Clang.

And Android uses Clang for its Linux kernel.

-fbounds-safety is not yet available in upstream Clang though:

> NOTE: This is a design document and the feature is not available for users yet.


Amateurs...


I think Zig is trying to get rid of it as well, much harder to debug iirc.



System admins are probably cheaper that Cloud experts devops.


Good system admins? No.


Not at scale to run your own bunch of servers competently.


I wish we had something like "source hash" available in all repositories.


I played GTA III at like 14-16 fps. After a while you brain get used to it and feels a like a smooth experience. Maybe we have frame generation integrated in our brains? or just happens when we are kids? idk.


Where we put the line within AI-generate vs AI-assisted (aka Photoshop and other tools)?


Was the torrent protocol considered at some point? Always surprised how little presence has in the industry considering how good the technology is.


If you strip out the swarm logic (ie. downloading from multiple peers), you're just left with a protocol that transfers big files via chunks, so there's no reason that'd be faster than any other sort of download manager that supports multi-thread downloads.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Download_manager


Aspera did the chunking and encryption for you, and it looked and acted like SFTP.

The cost of leaking data was/is catastrophic (as in company ending) So paying a bit of money to guarantee that your data was being sent to the right place (point to point) and couldn't leak was a worthwhile tradeoff.

For Point to point transfer torrenting is a lot higher overhead than you want. plus most clients have an anti-leaching setting, so you'd need not only a custom client, but a custom protocol as well.

The idea is sound though, have an index file with and then a list of chunks to pull over multiple TCP connections.


torrent is great for many-to-one type downloads but I assume GP is talking about single machine to single machine transfers.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: