It's been discussed a number of times on HN. The Wall Street Journal even had an article about counterfeits on Amazon a few years ago. There's one at [1] (paywall, naturally).

I'm not sure if it is fraud, but it definitely aided and abetting counterfeiters, and I think it is a travesty that Amazon has not been fined for it. I also actively avoid buying from Amazon partly because of this (and this decision will make no difference; I have no interest in patronizing a company that does this, unless I see some repentance), although there really isn't anyone else for a lot of items.

[1] https://www.wsj.com/articles/amazon-has-ceded-control-of-its...

It is not my job to be the regulator, that is the regulators jobs. I do nopt have the time of capacity in my bipolar affected mind to cram in the detail of this corrupt capitalist world we all let happen.

And I cannot read that article because it is behind a paywall and I am too poor and homless to afford a subscription.

And how many people even come to HN (not just thinking about myself).

And now I have no option but to buy from amazon since I am homeless and do not have a fixed address where I can has stuff shipped to.

All of your point are fine if you are well off and capable, but putting this on me, and people like me, is just wrong.

If you want to organize a boycott against amazon, I will be right there with you. Until then all you have are words.

I read fantasy set a thousand years in the past, and yet the women are all individualistic and liberated, no women ever spend any time spinning thread, and the monks don't really believe in Christ. Ken Follett really tried with the monks, but although he clearly did a lot of research, it felt like it was alien to him. Br. Cadfael, for all of Ellis Peter's research still thinks like a modern. For that matter, maybe they had legitimately grasped it and I missed it because I was still Baptist when I read them, while medieval monks were obviously Roman Catholic. I've learned enough since then to know that Baptists don't understand Roman Catholics one bit.

"Why?" That's generally what motivates me to learn. Information is merely the raw material for Understanding.

Agreed. The beauty is that there is always another why behind each why.

“I’ve got zero beef with my local Humane Society”: this is wonderful! It’s got irony but the irony of the irony is that it’s literally correct.

You can't outsource expertise. You don't get domain knowledge without spending the time to understand the breadth of the domain.

My problem isn't lack of determinism, it's that it's solution frequently has basic errors that prevent it from working. I asked ChatGPT for a program to remove the background of an image. The resulting image was blue. When I pointed this out to ChatGPT it identified this as a common error in RGB ordering in OpenCV and told me the code to change. The whole process did not take very long, but this is not a cycle that is anything I want to be part of. (That, and it does not help me much to give me a basic usage of OpenCV that does not work for the complex background I wanted to remove)

Then there are the cases where I just cannot get it do what I ask. Ask Gemini to remove the background of an image and you get a JPEG with a backed in checkerboard background, even when you tell it to produce an RGBA PNG. Again, I don't have any use for that.

But it does know a lot of things, and sometimes it informs me of solutions I was not aware of. The code isn't great, but if I were non-technical (or not very good), this would be fantastic and better than I could do.

I don't generally have to entrust myself to humans doing crazy things, though. An actual person driving a taxi is familiar enough with the roads that they are unlikely to do something like that. Probably also Uber/Lyft drivers. And there is usually an option to rent a car and drive yourself, in which case any craziness the driver suffers from is at least my own fault.

Musk used to be seen as an engineer. He co-founded a payments company that merged with PayPal (not sure if he did engineering, though). I believe he is widely seen as being a knowledgeable rocketry engineer. I also think that he contributed to engineering of early Teslas. Now he is completely over-committed, and seems to me like he is burnt-out but does not realize it, and is doing all sorts of crazy things which act to sort of paper that over. Twenty years ago he was seen as a high-level engineer (I've heard that Marvel's Tony Stark was based on Musk [I mean, obviously it was based on the comic book character, but hopefully you know what I mean]).

He co-founded a payments company - he certainly wasn't an engineer. He was fired and given a golden parachute from Paypal for his incompetent insistence that they stop all software development at PayPal for a year so that they could move off Linux and move to fully hosting on Windows NT servers (!). He was a manager and money guy from the start, he never was a software engineer or any kind of engineer.

I guess based on all the phrases like “used to” and “seen as,” you’d agree that these perceptions were never really all that realistic, right? He had better PR in the past for sure, but it was always just a PR thing. That makes his behavior a bad example of something engineers do.

We’ve got plenty of smug actual engineers, we don’t need to take blame for some cosplayer’s bad behavior.

I think Jimmy John's does a good job making excellent bread. I'm not sure that it is bakery quality, but it is definitely noticeable. I've bought their day-old bread instead of grocery store baked bread. I think Subway's bread is pretty good, too, except they skimp on the flour.

The aroma of bread being baked is a glorious delight, yet somehow whenever a Subway is baking the smell gives me nausea and I can’t even go near the shop. Yes, it is edible and inoffensive once baked; I have no idea what they do to make the baking process smell so badly.

Yes, I used to live in a building that had a 24-hkur Subway connected to the lobby. The subway fart was omnipresent.

Now that women can work, ratcheting effects of dual-income households being able to spend more mean that generally two incomes are required to keep up the same standard of living, so now women must work. This does not seem like an improvement to me. Before, women who wanted to work could not, now women who want to stay at home with their kids can not.