Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | queenkjuul's commentslogin

Well here in Chicago we learned that you CAN interview the agents and they'll just deny saying and doing the things their own cameras proved them to have done and said.

Oh wow somebody decided news about an international tech giant is suddenly irrelevant on a site about tech news, crazy how that happens with one particular category of tech news...

Grok loves to make things lewd without asking first.

Musk pretends he made Vision but what he made was Great Value Ultron

Yes. One, they could just turn it off. Two, they got it to parrot all musk's politics, they clearly have a good grip on the thing.

Maybe companies shouldn't release tools to generate CSAM, and shouldn't promote those tools when they know they produce CSAM.

sorry you're not convincing me. X chose to release a tool for making CSAM. they didn't have to do that. They are complicit.


A pen is also a tool for making CSAM.

Truly, civilization was a mistake. Retvrn to monke.


Which other tools publicly post CSAM?

"we take action... Including permanently suspending accounts" unless, of course, the account is Elon's pet

CUPS has "just worked" on Ubuntu for me for like, as long as I can remember. If you use only GTK apps and either gnome or cinnamon, things are a lot more consistent than Windows (like, windows itself, not even 3rd party stuff)

I agree with the piece but i have a hard time admitting that a site with fake snow falling in front of the screenshots is dispensing sound design advice

I finally talked my company into letting me swap out my MacBook pro for some little Dell. After the last year of updates, my Mac has stopped resuming from sleep reliably, everything is ugly, they took the already barely usable (imo) finder and system settings and found exciting new ways to make them worse. Sadly corporate security means os updates were not optional.

I've never really liked macOS but it feels like someone at Apple was hired just to make it even less likable for me personally lol


> already barely usable (imo) finder

been using a Mac for years, and to this day I don't know how it's possible to navigate directories using Finder. It only has shortcuts for a few folders by default (photos, documents...) and doesn't have a button to navigate to the parent folder. I have literally no idea how to get to my home directory, I need to use the CLI


> doesn't have a button to navigate to the parent folder.

Command + Up Arrow, which is also visible if you click on the "Go" menu. There is also a toolbar button that shows the entire set of enclosing directories; offhand I can't remember whether this is visible by default. There is also "View -> Show Path Bar" which shows all this information at the bottom of the window.

> I have literally no idea how to get to my home directory

Go -> Home, which shows a shortcut key for this, Command-Shift-H.


I've grown increase hate towards Finder to the point that I avoid using at all costs. I've been migrating to the terminal, using fzf to find files and directories and yazi for a more graphical experience.

How can it be called FINDER, if it can't FIND things? cmd+shift+g should be a fuzzy search, but it returns nothing 80% of the time. cmd+f often can't see files that are in first level folders inside my home folder.

Meanwhile, hitting Esc+C in the terminal (via fzf) it's totally effective.


Off the top of my head, I want to say you can right-click on the current folder name to see (and navigate to) all its ancestors.

Correct - IIRC it's called the "proxy icon"

> I have literally no idea how to get to my home directory

Just add it to the sidebar. Finder > Settings > Sidebar > Locations. Or drag it into Favorites.

> doesn't have a button to navigate to the parent folder

View > Show Path Bar. You can also right click on the directory name at the top of the window and it’ll give you the same options.


I’ve said many times before that I think Finder is the worst default file manager of any popular desktop environment.

I get it’s supposed to be easy to use but so much functionality is hidden behind non-obvious shortcuts. The end result is you either need to memorise a dozen secret handshakes just to perform basic operations, or you give up and revert to 70s technology in the command line.


> I’ve said many times before that I think Finder is the worst default file manager of any popular desktop environment.

[GNOME enters the chat]: "That's nothing, I'm way worse!"


When on macOS using Finder I often wish I had something as nice and consistent and usable as Nautilus.

Finder is genuinely horrible. It’s obvious no one at Apple cares about files anymore nor anyone working with them.

We’re all supposed to consume cloud these days or so it seems.


My go to example would be long lasting issues with SMB support in Finder. All operations are very slow, the search is almost unusably so. The operations that are instant on every non-Apple device take ages on a Mac. I first ran into these issues 7 years ago when I set up my NAS, and they present to this day. I tried all random suggestions and terminal commands, but eventually gave up on trying to make it perform as it does on Linux.

With Apple's focus on cloud services, fixing the bugs that prevent the user from working with their local network storage runs contrary to their financial incentives.


Is it actually though? It’s cool to criticise Nautilus but, at worst, it’s just equally as bad as Finder. Which shouldn’t be surprising given how much it’s styled to look like Finder.

However in my personal opinion Nautilus’s breadcrumb picker does edge it against Finder.

So I stand by my comment that Finder is the worst.


Nautilus opens a new window for every folder you enter. Finder does not.

That used to be a preference, and last I used it, it was not. It is forced on because that’s how the GNOME developers thought you should use it… “Our way or the highway!” — GNOME devs.

Finder wins based on that alone. Finder wins so completely because of that one single thing that I’ll never voluntarily use GNOME again.


You can add shortcuts to the sidebar by dragging. You can right click the folder name in the top bar to get a list of parents. You can also View > Show Path Bar and see the the full clickable bread crumbs. Not sure why this is so confusing if you bother to try.

Even after decades of using macOS I still cannot wrap my head around the fact that Finder has no single button shortcut for opening a file - the most common operation a file manager should do. It’s Cmd+O, and it cannot be changed to anything sane like Enter key.

You can remap it to any shortcut you want (as long as it has a modifier key in it)

>as long as it has a modifier key in it

Why on Earth is this a requirement? When you're navigating through Finder using keyboard, it's very inconvenient to use two keypresses to perform a very basic operation. Using Enter to open a file is how every file manager on every operating system works except Finder. Why would Enter key be hardcoded to a file rename operation instead?

It is a typical Apple behaviour of doing things differently from the rest of the world just for the sake of it, even when it's detrimental to the user experience.


>Why on Earth is this a requirement?

Actually I just checked and it's not, technically you can create key equivalents without modifiers as well [1]. For Finder this doesn't work though, because enter seems to be specifically handled before menu-level key equivalent processing. (Note that it's not guaranteed to work on other apps either, based on [2] seems key equivalents are only dispatched if modifier keys exists. But that might be out of date since it worked for the people in the SE post.)

Option+Enter is the next closest thing.

I agree that their implementation here is not good. In fact there's already a "Rename" menu item, which isn't actually wired to the enter hotkey (this is very un mac like because it means there is no easy way to discover it). The "rename" menu item is actually a fairly recent addition to mac (I think maybe 10.11) while Finder itself is ancient (it was one of the last few apps to be migrated to Cocoa and even today still has lots of legacy warts), and possibly no one bothered cleaning things up.

[1] https://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/132984/keyboard-sh...

[2] https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/Co...


Space for preview.

Do you like Windows dark patterns more than Mac's shitty designs? Seems like no one wins here. I personally just refrained from upgrading to Tahoe

Edit:typo


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: