Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | rambambram's commentslogin

From above: "endless job that could kill somebody if you stop paying attention"

> In other words, I try to learn from it whenever it does something I can't do...

So you know it can be full of sh1t on all kinds of topics, and you start learning from it the moment it's 'talking' about subjects you know you don't know about? To me that sounds like the moment to stop, not the moment to start. Or am I missing something?


Sounds like an extension of https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Gell-Mann_Amnesia_effect, but sub newspaper for large language model.

Been saying this for years. The www is already a social network.

It might sound stupid, but I'm not a git or github user, I would rather fill in a webform to submit a new website and feed.

The (artificial) barrier to entry is there for a reason - one person maintains the entire project and because it is fairly technical to submit the acceptance rate has been close to 99%.

I guessed that might be the reason, smart move. Have you tried a webform in the past which resulted in a lot of crappy submissions?

Not to take away from your experience, but I wrote my own simple self-hosted RSS reader and it has no problems at all with around 2000 feeds I throw at it regularly. About 1% of the feeds does not parse for me, probably because of incorrect xml or a bug on my part.

Same, have no problems using FreshRSS.

Nice. I like how clicking a tag also makes the word 'tag' light up.

Thanks for the kind words!

I got encouraged by another HN poster a few days ago, let me know if you have any suggestions.

I’m always open to criticism.


Everything clicks nice, so to speak. A nice UI you have there.

I would suggest you explain what it's about in one sentence, just like you explain in your HN profile. The About-page says not so much. You can add some explanation there, or even just one sentence at the top of the homepage (or other pages).


I got:

> Failed sending verification e-mail to XXX@XXmail.XXX, please contact administrator on stonky@stonkys.com


Thanks for the info, I’ll fix it tonight

Still waiting for that Contact link...

On it


BTW the black on white is EXCELLENT

I'm not a native English speaker, but since when became 'lessons' a 'learnings'?


As a native (Commonwaelth) english speaker of six decades+ .. it only really "appeared" in frequency during the past decade, more heavily in the past five years or so, in central north American settings.

Grammerly will tell us:

  Despite being more popular than “lessons” in the corporate setting, “learnings” is still incorrect. It's an erroneous plural form of the colloquial term “learning.”
~ https://grammarist.com/usage/learnings/

As a business-speak buzz-word it might fade, or it may end up with a greater global footprint outside of the Biz-speak Babel tower.


Probably due to the movie "Borat! Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan".

People missed the joke that it was poor English on purpose.


I could google it, but I would rather ask HN: what are the best pens (or pen(cil)/paper-combination) for keeping written text as long as possible? I had some Stabilo pen which was very nice ergonomically, but the blue ink faded within a couple of years (laying on my window sil in the sun, but still).

My guess is: regular graphite pencil on porous paper is best. Any ideas about further things I have to take into account?


I don't think there's a simple answer. For example, someone recommended black ink on white paper, but it really depends on the composition of that ink. Inorganic pigments last forever, but the ink used in black sharpies actually fades pretty quickly.

Pencil definitely lasts if the paper is undisturbed. I have some paperwork that's 100+ years old and with legible pencil text. On the flip side, if the paper is handled a lot, the writing will gradually fade because graphite particles just sit on the surface and can flake off.

On some level, the medium is your main problem. Low-grade paper, especially if stored in suboptimal conditions (hot attic, moist crawlspace, etc), may start falling apart in 20 years or less. Thick, acid-free stock stored under controlled conditions can survive hundreds of years.


Thanks for the insight.

Acid-free paper sounds like the way to go. Do you have experience with this? Or is it common knowledge? Just curious!

I also read letters from my grandparents, stored by my parents in a simple shoe box. No special conditions, just light-free and inside the home for decades. They were still very much readable. I did not pay enough attention, but I guess it was blue ink from back in the day that they used.


> Do you have experience with this? Or is it common knowledge? Just curious!

I collect vintage stuff that sometimes comes with paperwork, usually after spending a decade or two stashed away in the attic.


I vote for graphite on paper. Ink will run if the paper gets wet. Of all the damage that has occurred to my papers, water is the most common. I keep a copy of important phone numbers written inside my wallet in case I ever lose my phone. Between an unexpected rainstorm, to an unchecked pocket before putting pants in a washing machine, to a spilled drink, I have gotten my wallet wet several times. Every time I used ink, I had to rewrite the list, but now with graphite, it isn't a problem.


Only ordinary dye-based ink will run if the paper gets wet.

It is easy to find either roller pens or ink for fountain pens that are pigment-based, lightfast and waterproof. It is very easy to test yourself that with such ink water has no effect whatsoever over the written text (after a minute or so of drying after writing). For example, there are many kinds of Uni-Ball roller pens with waterproof ink, but there also many other brands with similar products. (Only fountain pens, roller pens and gel pens may have pigment-based ink, the paste ink used by ball-point pens is easily washed by alcohol or other organic solvents.)

In my experience with graphite on paper, it is a much worse choice, because the writing will fade over the years, due to the rubbing of the paper sheets from each other.

The pigment-based black inks also use carbon, like graphite pencils, but any ink contains not only a pigment, but also a glue that binds the pigment to the paper, so it will not be rubbed out by touching it.


Thanks! I appreciate the input.

Do you just use regular graphite pencils, like with the HB scale or something?


I just use the same BIC mechanical pencils with #2 lead that I picked up in college. No reason to get complicated.


For keeping written text as long as possible it matters which are the risks for various things that can happen to the text, because no writing method is equally resistant to all of them.

There are at least 4 dangers for a written text: mechanical rubbing, fading due to light, water and organic solvents (e.g. alcohol).

There are many pigment-based inks that are specified to be lightfast and resistant to water and organic solvents, according to various archiving standards. Such inks are available for fountain pens or they are used in certain kinds of roller pens.

If you use such inks on paper that is somewhat porous, they will also be resistant to rubbing. There are certain kinds of "permanent pens", which have excellent resistance to rubbing even when you write on surfaces like plastic, glass or metal, not only on glossy paper, and which may also be lightfast and waterproof, but the text written with such permanent pens is easily washed with alcohol or other organic solvents (like also for text written with ball-point pens).

So the answer depends on your goal, but usually what you want is either a roller pen or ink for a fountain pen that are clearly specified as being pigment-based, lightfast and waterproof, together with paper on which you have checked that rubbing does not remove the written text. When using fountain pens, one must check that the archival pigment-based ink is known to be compatible with the model of fountain pen, otherwise clogging may occur. (For example, I use pigment-based ink cartridges from Sailor Japan, seiboku or souboku, with Sailor fountain pens, so compatibility is guaranteed.)

While graphite-based pencils produce writing that is lightfast and resistant to solvents, in my experience the inherent rubbing of the sheets of paper when you handle the notebook, or whatever you had used for writing, leads over the years to a fading of the text, so I do not like this method.


Black ink on white paper, stored in a cool dark place, will last many decades. If may fade but will remain readable. Want centuries? Use skin parchment. Millenia? An engraving pen on glass. Going for longer? Take a grinder to a block of granite, but the real problem there is the lack of geologically-stable storage on this planet.


Granite is heavy and brittle. Instead, take a plate made of platinum or iridium, and engrave information on it. It offers excellent mechanical, chemical, and thermal durability. It can sink in volcanic lava and then hammered back out from the resulting rock, intact. (Expensive though.)


> Instead, take a plate made of platinum or iridium

No no no no no!

Archival data should never be made on intrinsically valuable material; doing so makes it subject to theft or re-use for something "better".

Example: There is a reason why more marble statues survive from antiquity than bronze statues.... Bronze has an intrinsic value (theft) and future artists would also melt down existing bronze statues to make something "better".


An engraving pen on glass? Why not get some sheet glass and a stick of color. Write it directly onto the glass _in glass_


A couple of millennia might suffice. ;) Thanks for the input.

The engraving pen on glass is a good one. Any experience with it?


In the UK “registrar’s ink” is used for marriage certificates, I believe it is supposed to be good for many hundreds of years.


I was going to say registrars in too, I've a bottle of this I've played about with.

https://www.diamineinks.co.uk/products/diamine-30ml-archival...

> Waterproof archival quality fountain pen ink in Blue-Black. Initially writes Blue, then oxidises to Black over time as it bonds to the paper. Traditionally used to record births, deaths & marriages.

And from another source :-

> Permanent archival blue-black ink based on an iron-gall formulation, as used by registrars and the clergy for official documents.

> Iron gall ink formulations have been used for around 1,500 years, and many of the world's most historic documents have been written using it. This ink will remain legible for hundreds of years.

> Please Note: This is an iron-gall ink, which contains particles that can clog fountain pen feeds. It's also acidic, which can damage steel nibs. Use with caution, and at your own risk. Not for use in valuable pens.


I'd think thin copper sheet on something soft would also work. That indentation will probably outlast any sort of ink


I've done that the past couple of years two handfuls of times. Mostly to people I discovered on HN, with a nice hardware or software project. Only once did I get a nasty reply (probably because I was too much in my enthusiasm), so I'll remember you, you Italian prick. ;)

Most replies are very nice. People really feel seen and appreciated when I compliment them on their cool project and nice write up.

Even if no one replies, I would still send the occasional email, because I want independent websites/blogs to thrive and stay.


I've been calling it 'Really Social Sites' for a long time. ;)


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: