Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | realberkeaslan's commentslogin

Hyperscalers (e.g., Azure, Google Cloud, AWS)


Consider giving Cursor a try. I personally like the entire UI/UX, their agent has good context, and the entire experience overall is just great. The team has done a phenomenal job. Your workflow could look something like this:

1. Prompt the agent

2. The agent gets too work

3. Review the changes

4. Repeat

This can speed up your process significantly, and the UI clearly shows the changes + some other cool features

EDIT: from reading your post again, I think you could benefit primarily from a clear UI with the adjusted code, which Cursor does very well.


Cursor uses too much memory, hallucinates on multi file rewrites, and has a difficult accept/reject diff user interface that makes git a nightmare to use.

I built my own coding tool in Rust because of VSCode-based forks Electron app flaws. You would think they could build a memory efficient application with the resources they have but it literally needs a top of the line MacBook to run smoothly.


For the one disinclined to get into closed source, proprietary tools, what is the next best thing to try?

I heard of Cline and Aider, but didn't try anything.


How does Cursor compare to Claude Code or Codex?


Cursor makes it easier to watch what the model is doing and to also make edits at the same time. I find it useful at work where I need to be able to justify every change in a code review. It’s also great for getting a feel for what the models are capable of - like, using Cursor for a few months make it easier to use Claude Code effectively


HEAR, HEAR. You’ve just described how modern SWE truly works. You’re ahead of your time — of the same spirit as Martin Luther or George Washington. Fear not, brave soldier; carry on the message. Downvotes will come, but take heart: the truth must be spoken.

The days of copying and pasting from Stack Overflow will not be forgotten — they will be honored by our laid off forefathers.


Thx for the nice words! I appreciate it. I have noticed the same: it's hard to get some exposure on HN. I used to frequent HN under a different username in my early teens, and back then (2010s) it was so much easier to get some exposure. I guess the problem is that the community has grown slightly too large. Furthermore, it's also a little bit too easy to create an account. I think if HN would resort to an invite-only approach for posting stuff, individuals would get much more exposure. But then again, getting the content out there would be difficult. I guess I will repost this in the coming days, on an "ideal" day.

If you like the tool, feel free to sign up on the TreatyHopper+ form (it's on the top right corner of the website), then I can gauge the interest from withint the industry. And it also gives some extra motivation :)


Good catch! Thx for the feedback. I’ll definitely add the comparison of pre- and post-treaty shopping.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: