> Current EU company structures like the European Company (SE) are made for public companies and ill-suited for startups due to high capital requirements, complex formation processes, and heavy administrative burdens. A flexible, tailored EU-wide entity for startups will solve these issues.

From the FAQ https://www.eu-inc.org/faq

Thank you - it is indeed €120k minimum capital

Then I suggest they make noise to lower it to €1 - much easier than creating a new legal structure

> (to JS programmers: not that kind)

Paint it Back (2013) was the first nonogram game I devoured and still have a great memories of playing it by the pool.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1PjruB8wDLQ

https://apps.apple.com/us/app/paint-it-back-gameclub/id14915...

Less pretty but very functional app with near infinite content to play these days is Nonograms Katana.

https://apps.apple.com/de/app/nonograms-katana/id1037710023?...

Nonograms Katana also has a Web version: https://nonograms-katana.com/play/

I use it almost daily on my laptop.

On my phone, I use Nonogram Galaxy. So much that my previous phone has some of the app layout burned-in on the OLED screen.

The android version of Katana looks and functions a bit better. I don't know if the devs are just less informed or just care less for iOS but, having made the switch recently, it's a pretty drastic difference.

Related ruff rule: https://beta.ruff.rs/docs/rules/logging-f-string/

Loved the little message to Charlie Marsh at the end of the OP.

Also, ruff has an issue to implement all of the rules. OP, excellent idea, and also, hats off to the ruff team, really: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7248

Thank you for the kind words :)

You’ve made my Python projects more enjoyable this year more than any other change I can think of

A more obscure one is about handling the exception when __str__ or __repr__ raises.

"Fixed, variable, and total board member compensation of DAX/MDAX/SDAX companies by gender (2013 to 2021) [GER]" would be my title suggestion

I’ve rewritten a bunch of our tests to this factory pattern last week, too (the factory is a fixture though - FactoryBoy is worth a look).

I’d argue that too many global fixtures in conftest have a high risk of becoming a “Mystery Guests” or too general fixtures. For a test reader it’s impossible to know the semantics of “institution_10”.

I believe this to be rooted in DRY obsession leading to coupling of tests: “We need a second institution in two modules? Let’s lift it up to global!”

1. Misleading headline. Glasser says that there’s no clear definition of „hate speech“ so you won’t know what you’ll get when you ask government to ban it. Just because something is ambiguous doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist (e.g. definition of freedom is also ambiguous, doesn’t mean „no such thing as freedom exists“). What are words even? 2. Shady website. Unclear who runs it. Seems to have been popular on Parler according to Google index.

A too short or complete lack of an alternatives section has become red flag for me when reviewing proposals.

I often scroll to the alternatives section first thing to see whether at least a few alternatives were honestly evaluated. Too often I just find some bullet points with abstract URLs (without any summary for the reader) and a statement that they would not be as great as the proposed solution - or no section at all.

It becomes impossible to provide constructive feedback at that point. It leaves me with the dreaded “Have you considered Alternative X, Y, Z?” or a passive-aggressive “Could you do an unbiased research of alternatives against the requirements?”

Even though the alternatives section tends to be towards the end of the document it doesn’t mean that it should be filled out at the end.

It only passed in the parliament, hasn't passed the council yet (bicameral legislature like in the US and many other countries).