I might get this with ui/styling experimentation. But shouldn’t devs have an idea of what they’re building - the specific building blocks, logical, and data flows - before you prompt? I couldn’t imagine getting three different one shot attempts at an implementation and having to validate and read through each one.
Not everything will work the first time. You could try 3 approaches and immediately discard the ones that don't pass tests. (Which is likely to be 1-2 of them)
On the flip side, our SaaS runs primarily on GCP so our users are fine. But our billing and subscription system runs on AWS so no one can pay us today.
CodeRabbit has GA'd its support for AI code reviews directly in your terminal. CodeRabbit CLI agent works with your coding agent (Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, etc.) and allows you to automate code reviews and bug fix right as you are building in your CLI.
To get started, run this command in your terminal ask your coding agent to run CodeRabbit reviews:
curl -fsSL https://cli.coderabbit.ai/install.sh | sh
The real warning sign (like flashing red lights x100) will be when potential AI Inra unicorn startups start delaying their IPOs or their public stock fails to rally after IPO
Yup, 100%. At some point there won't be any more private money so we'll start to see a flood of AI ipo's but eventually that will dry up too. We'll see it happen so be ready. My guess is that OpenAI's IPO will be the start of the no more private money cycle.
Or when they decide to stay private and hoover stupid money from Gulf states and SoftBank and don't get any. When the guy who thinks Neom is a good idea is not parted from his money, then it's really over.