Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | tapland's commentslogin

Tldr: Yeah it would make it better!

I hope I left the lead as the lead.

But I also think we've had a culture shift that's hurting our field. Where engineers are arguing about if we should implement certain features based on the monetary value (which are all fictional anyways). But that's not our job. At best, it's the job of the engineering manager to convince the business people that it has not only utility value, but monetary.


I've had plenty of use for mine, but I wish I had a library of mechanisms that work well that I could put together to build easily.

Learning modelling is a huge time sink, learning to make threaded parts, or anything modular to not have to re-print everything for changes. It's great but the printing is the easy part


For sure. Have you tried to use AI to build the models themselves yet? I'm curious if it can build mechanical systems well.


Is this an AI generated response?

Attackers have always been ahead. Its been reality since we've been permanently online


Doesn’t Brave has their own ‘Leo’ AI built in?


Yeah but I never use it. Also you can disable it easily.


Yes, if someone wrote a guide on how to do it and why, that’d be great.

Knowing where to look and which settings are relevant, for yourself, is a crazy ask of even very computer savvy users.


> a crazy ask of even very computer savvy users

Why?

When Mozilla updated Firefox with the AI chatbot feature the first thing I did was look in settings in how to remove it. When that failed I just googled it, which pointed me to about:config and which keys to look for.

Much easier to figure out with your intuition what `browser.ml.chat.enabled` could possibly mean than running pwsh script.

All it takes is a bare minimum of curiosity.


P. Sure the camera in question breaks in fun ways. From my observations because it can’t update it’s time, so messing with it a bit leaving to a need to update, downgrade, block from the web again.

But it’s worth trying


So it’s more like the top 0.001% who have the voting majority in this wonderful democratic system we all have our life savings dumped into.

What was your attempted point? Or did you not understand the issue that was brought up?


Is that a bad thing? Why would I want someone who can't even manage their own money to manage my life savings? If anything I'd expect a company where the decisions are in the hands of 99% John Smiths and 1% Warren Buffets to be even more short sighted, *especially* when it comes to splurging on dividends.


:)

You still don’t have a say and the investor is also the customer. How is it democracy or keeping companies to being good for society.


This is great. I’m going to start making something like this, but with some cut apple wood knobs, for my birds.


It’s a few games, but a few very important ones.

GTAVs online ecosystem with custom servers. Rust hasn’t enabled Linux Battleye support. Valorant

Some releases that are temporarily popular like BF6, playtest of Battleye games where Linux support isn’t enabled (Fellowship, Exoborne). All games in this paragraph also by Swedish developers. Kom igen, linuxstöd


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: