It should be at a minimum stored safely. How and why are the environmental effects not a factor for you?

Regular trash is already stored safely.

The great pacific garbage patch disagrees.

As mentioned in the other thread, ocean plastics have nothing to do with landfill-disposed trash. They're mostly fishing nets waste, and at that, mostly from mismanagement by a handful of poor countries.

I'll assume good faith here and that you were simply unaware of the origins of the so-called great garbage patch, but in future discussions I think it would do your arguments some credence not to bring up ocean plastics in response to discussion about landfills.

How and why are the environmental effects not a factor for you?

Sure, and of course the elephant in the room is overconsumption and planetary overload, which get unlocked too on a bigger scale as a result of similar thinking. Which ends does unlocking potentially endless ”experiences” serve? Our personal disconnect from nature is not separate from our collective disconnect from nature.

Or Meat, if they were completely honest about their users’ role in the equation </compulsory matrix reference>

And you could argue the competition is about creating meaning and orchestrating a story rather than individual words.

Even if you use AI to actually produce the individual words and still edit the text afterwards to match your meaning, first of all it might be more work than just writing it yourself, and second, it's basically like having a partner to throw around ideas with.

So sure, you might be cheating yourself, and at the end I don't think AI is going to produce anything of such enormous original value that it would in itself threaten the value of, say, literature.

At the end of the day the results are what count to me. If you're using AI in a disciplined way to help you learn to write better, then all the best to you.

The goal of the competition is to show that disciplined and consistent work can turn an idea into a finished first-draft of a story. You are competing against no one but yourself (and the clock), and if you cheat by using AI to write for you, then you are cheating no one but yourself.

> first of all it might be more work than just writing it yourself

I mean, that sounds like a great reason to not use AI, and if true, kind of defeats the purpose of condoning its use in the first place.

You're making this weird assumption that the only use of AI is to literally write the story for you, but 1) that's wrong and 2) nobody is actually suggesting or encouraging that for NaNoWriMo.