Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | tiagod's commentslogin

Many call centers have these privacy messages that play before you're actually put on hold. Just use the same feature with a 15min of waiting music.

Ah, so that the music changes and/or clips when you jump into the call queue. That way, you know you just got mishandled for 15 minutes. Diabolical.

For me, just removing "blonde" would be fine.

Interesting. And what do you find so objectionable about that?

After reading the article, I was disappointed to find that there doesn't seem to exist any video of the egg (and the working mechanism) on YouTube.

EDIT: I have found a low-quality video on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/reel/ChF_VDBo74j


Google Pixel with GrapheneOS


This is the correct answer. Anything proprietary phones home and inserts malicious metadata into pictures that allow others (social media) to know who, when and how the photo was taken.


You can even use the proprietary Pixel Camera on GrapheneOS and just deny network permissions, or if you’re worried about IPC (if you have another networked Google app installed) it can be in its own private space. And then just strip the exif data if you want before sending it anywhere.


Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I guess if you aim well enough, there could be a very long, narrow, non-reflective cylinder in front of the receiver that would block all light that is not coming exactly from the direction of the target satellite.


"If you aim well enough" is doing a ton of work there. Precise real-time optical tracking of a satellite from a moving platform is an extremely difficult problem. Even if the satellite itself is geostationary, it would also have to rotate to keep the "cylinder" pointed in the right direction to maintain signal.

I suppose you could make a "cylinder" or "cone" broad enough that, if the threat was static, could blot-out attempted jamming from only certain regions while staying open facing toward friendly zones.


It's a geostationary sat. It doesn't move.


No, but the airplane it would be talking to does. Hard enough when your transceiver is wide open, if you narrow your FOV to a thin cone in order to block jamming signals, the GEO now has to physically track the airplane somehow.

Either the whole satellite rotates or the transciever is on a mount that can rotate


Unless you plan on having 1 satellite per airplane, something tells me it's harder to constrain the FOV than you might suggest. There's also the small problem of the energy, complexity, & weight of having motorized parts on the satellite (or fine-grained attitude control for the satellite itself to track the craft).


Agreed, my point is it's a lot harder than tiagod made it sound.

It also doesn't account for some kind of mobile jammer making it inside the cone, particularly if it's staring at an adversarial nation where secure comms would be needed the most, but the adversary would have freedom of movement.


You will probably need to increase the gain (better lens, photomultipliers) on the receiver photodiode too.


your assuming the target satellite doesn't reflect?


Scams have been using LLMs for a while. know of two people so far that got their card stolen and used to buy chatgpt subs.


Goring them is about sending a message.


(2009)


High aperture = Blur

Unfortunately the lower number actually means bigger aperture.


And that's what exactly confused me :)

With my mnemonic, I say low *number = blur

I should have been more specific


The aperture size is usually described as e.g. f/32, where f is a camera-specific constant.

Denominator, not numerator. That's why larger number = smaller aperture.


To be a little more precise, f is not a camera-specific constant. It's the focal length of the lens. It's a formula that tells you the diameter of the entrance pupil. So at a focal length of 50mm, an aperture value of f/2 means an entrance pupil diameter of 25mm.

But photographers generally just say "f2", meaning an aperture value of two set on the dial of the camera/lens. It's one stop faster (twice as much light) as f/2.8. It'll give you a relatively shallow depth of field, but not as shallow as e.g. f/1.4.


It's a standalone network. Most Portuguese cards are also VISA/Mastercard, but payment terminals may only have a contract with Multibanco, meaning only Portuguese cards are accepted. It's quite common for foreign cards not to be accepted.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: