Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | timschumi's commentslogin

Every system and package manager will be affected if it cannot download source code to build a package.

NixOS less so, because pretty much all source downloads that are not restricted by license are a separate output that will therefore be stored on (and downloadable from) NixOS cache servers.

I'm not sure what your expectation for this is in general, nobody can just wish into existence data that is just gone.


> LineageOS was one of the OG de-googled Android ROMs, renamed a few years after Android Jellybean IIRC.

Existing since 2009 as CyanogenMod and since 2016 as LineageOS, that would have been around the time where Android 7 (Nougat) was current.

PS: Not that we are in any way degoogled, other than what we are forced to by the license.


Thanks Tim… my memory is fuzzy - that was a lot of phones ago.

… and thank you for your continued effort! I have very big love for CyanogenMod/LineageOS, and that’s coming from a heavy pre-XDA user (I’ve had them all - PalmOS, Zaraus, XDA o2, Maemo, FirefoxOS, Ubuntu phone user).


It's unfortunate that he uploaded this without notable commit history, it would be interesting to see how long it takes a programmer of his caliber to bring up a project like this.

That said, judging by the license file this was based on QuickJS anyway, making it a moot comparison.


It does say "public repository of..." implying there's a non-public one with real history. Not sure why not upload the main one though.


If he's anything like me (doubtful but roll with it), the commit history when prototyping is probably something like "commit", "commit", "fixed a bug", etc.


Maybe he just oneshotted it


Maybe claude code uses bellard as agent


Claude is really Bellard sitting in his kitchen, sipping coffee, casually replying to code requests while getting ready for his day.


This explains a lot. Opus 4.5 gives you access to Bellard after his second cup of coffee.


Is Bellard the “Chuck Norris” of Programming?


He is extremely productive in its specialty: the intersection of programming language and system programming. I don't think that makes him superhuman.

It's more a model of what a really talented person who applies themselves building things they enjoy building can do.

I prefer thinking of it this way: if Bellard can make a small JS engine from scratch by himself, what's really stoping you from knocking down this library you are thinking about.


> He is extremely productive in its specialty: the intersection of programming language and system programming.

Why do you say that specifically is his specialty? He also started QEMU and ffmpeg which are foundational pieces of software for several industries, and his day job is as founder of a company that makes software defined radio test equipment for cellular networks. There isn't one thing I could point at as a specialty.


All of this seems to fit the bill pretty closely to me.

Ffmpeg uses a ton of arcane C and assembly knowledge to make multimedia system manageable and efficient. QEMU uses dynamic binary translation for hardware emulation and virtualization. Amarisoft speciality is basically using software to do things which are usually done by hardware.

The intersection of programming language and system programming seems to me like a pretty fair description of what Fabrice Bellard is extremely good at.


A sort of reverse code golf where he doesn't care what he sends as all that code will never touch his prod code bases.


I’d expect much better results, honestly


"You're right! I apologize for the confusion. I am, in fact, Fabrice Bellard. Comment allez-vous?"


It's Fabrice so there's a chance he did


That's... cool, I guess?


Somebody posted 'Adobe Photoshop 1.0 Source Code (1990)' recently so I think this post is some kind of smartass response to that.


Not for the ones on the receiving end.


Being on the receiving end of valid, technical criticism in response to making misleading claims about GrapheneOS for falsely marketing products is their own choice. It's certainly a lot nicer than being on the GrapheneOS team heavily targeted by libel, bullying and harassment from those groups. Here's a recent example of the founder of /e/ and Murena linking to libelous harassment content on a conspiracy site, which links to a Kiwi Farms style character assassination video from someone friends with neo-nazis:

https://archive.is/SWXPJ https://archive.is/n4yTO

Check out the site for yourself. The linked video is plainly filled with extraordinarily dishonest claims that are widely disproven. Copperhead is losing the legal battle very badly and should end up paying our years of legal expenses soon. Other groups attacking us can look forward to similar losses in court when our attention moves to them. Years of libel, bullying and harassment has consequences.


There is a guide on how to set up LineageOS for libvirt (i.e. QEMU) [1], but there exist no prebuilt images at this point in time.

[1] https://wiki.lineageos.org/libvirt-qemu


The requirements are monstrous: 300GB storage, 32GB RAM. My everyday working laptop has a 240GB SSD. I've build the kernel, Firefox, and the heaviest packages which I use from sources with a fraction of those resources.

I can't even fathom what the build system is doing in order to require this amount of storage.


> I can't even fathom what the build system is doing in order to require this amount of storage.

A large number of 17 year old repositories, prebuilt toolchains, and the fact that you otherwise have every little bit of source code, intermediary results, and output to create a full operating system all in the same place.

As for the memory, the very first step (that basically already is the benchmark for the most memory usage) is loading the entire build tree and generating build steps. Yes, that takes 32GB of RAM, if not 64GB nowadays.


Okay, but I'm pretty sure Gentoo can compile an entire OS in way less disk+RAM than that, and I know NetBSD can.


As far as I have heard they have not actually secured partner access for themselves, they just got someone who has access to break their NDA.


No, GrapheneOS is partnered with a major Android OEM and has security partner access through them. Our security preview releases are in full compliance with the terms set by Google. It's permitted to ship the patches early with delayed source releases for the patches on the dates the embargoes end. The current patches are from the November 2025, December 2025 and January 2026 bulletins. We've shipped the full set of currently available patches for those 3 months.

See https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/24134-devices-lacking-stand... for a more detailed explanation.


The access comes from GrapheneOS' OEM partner who isn't breaking any kind of NDA.


I don't know the exact terminology, but they described what they currently have as security partner access or at least advanced access to security patches. To my knowledge they are still working on full partner access that would grant them timely access to the AOSP source code.


:^)


^^


Couldn't try to (together with Theo / t3) bully the Homebrew developers into a forced takeover of a package [1] if it were a conflict-free name.

[1] https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-cask/pull/229061


The cask has not been majorly updated in almost 10 years years and is used to connect to a mobile app that hasn't been on the Play Store for almost 5 years, while easily underneath the minimum threshold of downloads for being removed. What's wrong with asking to expedite the removal process, considering the process is detailed in the guidelines?


> What's wrong with asking to expedite the removal process, considering the process is detailed in the guidelines?

Asking is one thing, the other thing is not accepting the decision of a maintainer on a topic that is at the maintainers discretion and instead taking it to social media [1] [2] for it to be brigaded.

Addendum: It additionally appears that this was filed before the browser was even launched, if the Wayback Machine and their social media posts are anything to go by.

[1] https://x.com/uwukko/status/1970161297783238905 [2] https://x.com/theo/status/1970266199469810127


> My main complain by far to LineageOS is the necessity to wipe everything for major releases on my S10. That's not possible every year.

Are you sure that you are not just misinterpreting the upgrade instructions?

For the S10 a mandatory wipe-on-upgrade has last been the case when upgrading from versions _older than LineageOS 21.0_.

During the time where LineageOS 20 was the current version there was no requirement to wipe listed at all, so presumably it didn't exist then.


> For the S10 a mandatory wipe-on-upgrade has last been the case when upgrading from versions _older than LineageOS 21.0_.

Ah, that might be it. My current version is 21.

> If your device is running LineageOS version older than 21.0, wipe your data partition (this is usually named “Wipe”, “Format”, or “Factory reset”) .

https://wiki.lineageos.org/devices/beyond0lte/upgrade/

Yes ! Thank you, I can upgrade to 22 without wiping.


Just did the update. Thank you again.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: