Wow, I'm in genuine disbelief of what makes you call drama queen a woman that was so clearly sexually harassed? comments over chat from her manager telling her about his sexual life is something he should just let go? hearing stories of other women going thru the same? she should just 'grow a pair' and let it go?

And then you condone what management does because it is a difficult decision to let go a performant manager, so you're going to ignore evidence (screen shots of the sexual harassment, and, apparently not the first time either)?? Holy cow, if you think that's ok and management had a "hard" choice, then we live in parallel universes.

If you want to argue she's lying, fine, we have no proof other than her word so far, but if we're going to discuss the article content, how is that not harassment and how does she end up as a drama queen?