Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

In general it has more sensible commands

I completely disagree (and I don't think GDB's command set is all that great either); the page you linked shows that LLDB's commands are even longer, which is extremely annoying when you're forced to use it for any length of time. Getting a good standard hexdump out of either is a pain too, and LLDB has this ridiculously stupid arbitrary limit of 1024 bytes to display each command (which can be overridden by specifying an additional option each time, but... why!?)

I think "more sensible commands" would be what WinDbg and SoftICE have. Short and unobtrusive.



> the page you linked shows that LLDB's commands are even longer

Where? In almost all cases, LLDB has an alias for the GDB command.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: