Once a week is chronic use though, and long term too.
It's fine if this is actually tested in an RCT instead of a silly correlation that has any number of confounders such as:
- parental care - stable young people start smoking later and smoke less and/or less often
- wealth - rich people -"-
- mental illness
- social groups where early marijuana use can be special in other ways
- location
- other concurrent habits
I'd like to at least see a thorough analysis instead of one potentially random number average need with all sorts of biases. And just the bare bones of statistics have been applied to insufficient data.
The most reasonable paper, the IQ one, is funded by a drug prevention and treatment center.
And the other linked papers are a big bag of laughs. FMRI "looking" abnormal? Bah. Epigenetic study in vitro, wow, very useful if you're made of glass.
Precautionary principle is well applied here already, and in more reasonable countries. Remove reasons for abuse and it rarely happens.
It's fine if this is actually tested in an RCT instead of a silly correlation that has any number of confounders such as:
- parental care - stable young people start smoking later and smoke less and/or less often
- wealth - rich people -"-
- mental illness
- social groups where early marijuana use can be special in other ways
- location
- other concurrent habits
I'd like to at least see a thorough analysis instead of one potentially random number average need with all sorts of biases. And just the bare bones of statistics have been applied to insufficient data.
The most reasonable paper, the IQ one, is funded by a drug prevention and treatment center.
And the other linked papers are a big bag of laughs. FMRI "looking" abnormal? Bah. Epigenetic study in vitro, wow, very useful if you're made of glass.
Precautionary principle is well applied here already, and in more reasonable countries. Remove reasons for abuse and it rarely happens.