Yes. The terms "RESTish" or "lower REST" are just a way to stay buzzword compliant, not actually a way of elucidating anything. They're catch-all buzzword substitutes for more accurate terms.

They're particularly bad since a strict interpretation of REST can still be valuable, yet it makes REST itself seem overly nebulous and fluffy.

People advocating terms like "RESTish" or looser definitions of REST seem to think that REST is an ultimate goal of any decent web API. It's not, REST doesn't need to be used everywhere, your API isn't crap if it's not REST. So stop calling it REST like you're embarrassed to admit it's "just" RPC.

(Sorry for ranting in reply to you -- you seem to get it)