Well the fact that it was necessary to be revised, should give you a hint that s... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

hristov on March 16, 2011 | parent | context | favorite | on: The 'why I am not worried' article, edited by MIT ...

Well the fact that it was necessary to be revised, should give you a hint that some things were wrong with the original one.

joegaudet on March 16, 2011 [–]

From the looks of the diff, it appears as though all they did was add clarity. Not really revise any of the facts.

marshray on March 16, 2011 | [–]

I notice that they removed the implication that this reactor design incorporated a core catcher.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact