Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It’s hard to be sure, but it sounds like they were lower-level lawyers at the firm that won the Johnson case and wouldn’t have directly benefited monetarily from winning additional cases. Seemingly, they were offering to ruin the case by deliberately botching the tasks that their firm assigned to them, presumably without the firm’s knowledge.


Where did you find this information?


I believe it was in the Reuters article to which dang linked.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: