Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> misguided (phonebook-style "just the facts" neutrality is neither possible nor has it ever been the goal)

> That's a logical paradox and it has its roots in our discourse no longer being grounded in a shared, objective reality.

Don't you contradict yourself?

(Nb. I don't know anything about SSC. But I also think some kind of curated discussion is doomed to failure; although it may be interesting to its subscribers, it will never make a dent what is generally read and contributed to. Even if it is moderately successful, those who say "social media discussions are terrible" will continue to say "social media discussions are terrible", since those who want to use Twitter will continue to use Twitter, and that will always be more than those who use Curato. Just for the simple reason that people want to contribute. Probably split agreement/quality moderation is desirable and then crafting individual feeds so that you see quality posts you will probably disagree with more so than low-quality posts that you will probably disagree with. Threaded forums like HN also seem to get better contributions than person-based social media.)



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: