I asked for evidence. Rather than providing any you went on a diatribe about science. Until you can provide any reasonable evidence of your claim, you are nothing but a crank.
Yes - it was a diatribe about science but I thought there was a reason for it.
You assume that poisoning people to kill the cancer is a sensible treatment. There is supportive evidence for that, but I'm saying the evidence should not be accepted. The 'evidence' is actually PR for big pharma, not the unbiased evidence you think it is.
So, from my point of view, we both have no evidence.
But I am saying you are mislead when you think you have evidence.
