Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

My understanding was that skipping accessibility features was more about cost than anything else.


Cost, knowledge deficit of the designer &/or eng side, inertia.. there are a lot of reasons. Many html a11y features are as easy to implement as adding an attribute (but people are unaware) -- other things, like designing a product flow to be accessible, can't be fixed with engineering; they have to be redesigned.

My team at LinkedIn is trying to solve the eng side of this with a combination of automated tooling like linting & headless testing, reporting, etc., trying to make it as painless as possible for an engineer to fall into a pit of success re: a11y for web/mobile experiences.


Not cost of implementation, I don't think. Maybe cost of "lost value of data and advertising they could collect".

Do you think it's more expensive to implement a few accessibility features their site had with little effort in the 90s, or to fight a case to the Supreme Court, as in the case of Domino's?

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21188092


I doubt it would go to court the vast majority of the time, even for public facing sites, but especially not for internal facing.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: