Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

These go up for sale fairly regularly.


Where would one keep an eye out for such things? I like the idea but don't want one in Kansas.


Unfortunately, people tend to build nuke magnets in places that they are fine with nukes landing. Kansas, South Dakota, Idaho...


I wonder if your property's coordinates would remain in any old but still-commissioned targetting databases of adversarial nations. Like living under a big red X.


Where I lived after the Cold War the local news world cover imploding missile silos once in a while.

They interviewed the American and Russians (they get to watch) folks at the site.

Young reporter once asked how the Russians could be sure what silo it is if they’re escorted by Americans the whole time.

The American commander paused and said “My Russian counterpart here probably knows this location as well as I do.”

The Russian who previously only used a translator burst out in a smile and belly laugh.


This was my first thought. If I had a dollar for every time I ran across a database that was horrifically out of date I'd be...getting paid less than I already am


Well, there is a good argument to be made for being in the center of the attack as preferable to the alternative.


I always wondered how much targeting of silos occurred. Or at least how they dealt with that.

MAD really seemed to require you unleash everything and generally if the others did you would be targeting a lot of empty silos in the middle of nowhere. At least those in the Midwest.


My grandfather was in the US army and participated in nuclear weapons testing throughout his later career. He said if war broke out with the Soviets that everyone should go sit on the roof and wait for the mushroom cloud to be sure not to survive.


We should be grateful our ancient ancestors did not share this sentiment when struggling against other extinction level events.


What he said was the truth. That is why it has not happened.


People keep thinking we'll never accidentally send these things.

I can't be the only one that thinks it's inevitable based on the anecdotes.


Perhaps the stakes are so high that on this subject and this one alone humanity can exercise some continued competence.


What is the point of nuking something that is one of the only buildings specifically designed to withstand nuclear attacks? It seems kind of wasteful of weaponry to attack something that you cannot destroy. I would definitely take my chances in a nuclear silo in the event of such circumstances; if you are within 50 miles of anywhere that is hit with a modern nuclear weapon you are completely screwed unless you are underground in a structure designed to withstand the megaton winds and incredibly thermal radiance.


They won't withstand a direct hit. They're hardened but not against that. It would have to be inside a mountain like NORAD.

The plan was always to get them off the ground before most of the enemy missiles hit. And perhaps to withstand a nearby attack, as targeting tech in the 60s was not very accurate yet. But these days that won't work anymore.


Your alternative is not to nuke it, and allow the missile there to destroy one of your cities (or maybe one of your own remote missile sites, but who knows?).


Not always. The old Nike missile control building in the Santa Monica Mountains would have made for a sweet lair in a pretty good location.



Idaho sounds great! Would never ever live in the other two, ofc.


North Dakota too.


Also North Dakota, Montana, Wyoming.


Could I interest you in a Nike missile site? These are a lot closer to large cities since they were defensive.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nike_missile_sites#Uni...

These people seem to specialize silos

https://www.missilebases.com/





Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: