A large part of the list is ‘they cooperate with X that I don’t like’ ‘X that I don’t like works there’ and similar conjecture.
And to top it off ‘A judge told them not to link to some sites and they don’t’. Hardly a ‘privacy abuse’. More like a typical attempt at cancel culture.
> A large part of the list is ‘they cooperate with X that I don’t like’ ‘X that I don’t like works there’ and similar conjecture.
Exactly. By this standard I should not buy my food from any grocery store on this planet because they sell cereal sold by Nestle which want's private ownership of water that I'm against. This type of logic is not scalable in the least.
I basically agree with you on all points other than the judge one - the judge didn’t tell them to do anything because they are not an English company. It looks like the censorship is coming from their integration with Yahoo.
Some privacy issues with DuckDuckGo
A large part of the list is ‘they cooperate with X that I don’t like’ ‘X that I don’t like works there’ and similar conjecture.
And to top it off ‘A judge told them not to link to some sites and they don’t’. Hardly a ‘privacy abuse’. More like a typical attempt at cancel culture.