Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

They're fine reasons, I just think it's lame to tout how "open" they are when in practice, it's more like "open when we think it's a good idea".


According to this[1] data Honeycomb is <2% of used Android versions. With the versions that 98% of the devices run being open I'd say it's a bit more than just touting about it..

[1] http://developer.android.com/resources/dashboard/platform-ve...


> According to this[1] data Honeycomb is <2% of used Android versions.

Because it's a closed-source Android variant that only works on specific devices.


Why did they even bother, then? That info makes this whole thing less understandable to me, not more.

Edit: Actually, that's beside the point. I think the reason they made Honeycomb is because they thought a lot of people would buy Android tablets, because a lot of people were buying iPads. But they were wrong about that.

I'm just saying, if they did it this way one time, there's no guarantee they won't do it again. How "open" it is, is really subject to Google's whim.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: