Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That is kind of Moxie’s point. Buy functional stuff. Use it. Don’t become owned by the consumption, selection and use of it.


He’s not saying functional though, he says the worst version of something, which usually means crappy and unpleasant. Things like that make your life a little worse every time you use them. If it’s something like a fork that you use a lot every day, that’s just adding a lot of low-grade background unpleasantness to your life that is completely unnecessary.


He is using the hyperbole and contrast to "best" to make his point.


"The okayest" would have made for a much better article. I get what he means, but it's really not an argument for the worst thing, and I suspect that if pressed, even Moxie wouldn't deliberately e.g. buy a boat with a gaping hole in the bottom! But generally buying an okay version of something, which has no glaring problems and is available right now for a reasonable price, works pretty well.


“Satisficer” and “maximizer” are more useful concepts I think.


Perhaps the comparison between cutlery and motorcycles in the article is a little unfair, because (I imagine?) few people develop experience, knowledge and deep insights into cutlery that lead to a sense of blissful freedom, whereas that can probably happen to someone who gradually learns motorcycle maintenance by overcoming a series of practical real-world challenges.


Don't forget, worse is better


That explains a lot about the user experience of Signal the first and last time I used it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: