I mostly agree on precedent, as far as I know, but I would say that recent developments like the GDPR and others targeting digital practices are probably starting to broach this topic of what is public and what is private. And I’m asking because I don’t know whether precedent is changing right now; I imagine that it is changing in some locales. Googling just now I noticed that California passed a new privacy act in 2020. I’ve seen a lot of discussion and debate, and the idea that cheap mass surveillance technology is a marked departure from what was available before this century does legitimately question whether we can continue operating under the framework where anything done in public is free for someone else to record and consume. That idea is now much, much more prone to abuse than it was 30 years ago, right?