We know that now, don't we. Which means your focus should be on how this threat was perceived so incorrectly - not how the threat was ended.
A threat is a term used to describe anything that you perceive (correctly or incorrectly) as an immediate danger to yourself or those around you.
> Are you actually just stupid? Would you like to get shot at 1 time or 107 times?
Clearly you are not interested in learning here... but I'll try again.
The fact that these officers (likely a single officer actually) incorrectly identified this vehicle as a threat is where your energies should be placed. The round count is irrelevant, unless you assume the events of that day could not be avoided?
Given the events happened, 107 rounds is not surprising. Do not use round count like it's some sort of indicator of anything other than the wielder's own uninformed opinions. Just don't do it... focus on what matters instead.
We know that now, don't we. Which means your focus should be on how this threat was perceived so incorrectly - not how the threat was ended.
A threat is a term used to describe anything that you perceive (correctly or incorrectly) as an immediate danger to yourself or those around you.
> Are you actually just stupid? Would you like to get shot at 1 time or 107 times?
Clearly you are not interested in learning here... but I'll try again.
The fact that these officers (likely a single officer actually) incorrectly identified this vehicle as a threat is where your energies should be placed. The round count is irrelevant, unless you assume the events of that day could not be avoided?
Given the events happened, 107 rounds is not surprising. Do not use round count like it's some sort of indicator of anything other than the wielder's own uninformed opinions. Just don't do it... focus on what matters instead.