Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The problem is HN is an exhausting circular firing squad when it comes to crypto. I could extol the benefits of private currency on philosophical and moral grounds but this won’t convince a lot of people. So I try to put it in more concrete terms and then it’s either criticized or brushed off.

If you believe as I do that government control of money is a mistake for many different reasons, then crypto is a revolutionary technology. If you say “Bitcoin has all the problems” then I refer you to monero.



No, that's not the issue. The problem with crypto is the grift -- and the inability to see what's a grift and what's not. I believe the term "rug pull" is the vernacular in the crypto community you may be familiar with.


Nikola (US public company) was a grift and thousands of retail traders lost money despite all the protections of the SEC and other regulators. The CEO is going to jail but most people will get very little in compensation, if anything.

If the current system is so flawless, why does this keep happening? Clearly the system is not flawless.

I myself am extremely technical and able to understand the crypto industry. I can separate scams from not-scams.

Similarly, the Machine Learning / AI industry is chock full of charlatans and scammers who have stolen billions from investors. For example, Watson from IBM is a hyped technology and product that has now been shuttered.

The unique element of crypto is a retail investor can put their life savings into a scam. This is unfortunate but not a reason to ban the tech.

Nothing stops a lower-class person from entering a casino or using a sports betting app and losing their house. The pearl clutching on HN is legendary.


Let's assume XMR takes over the world and is the only currency in use.

Who pays taxes?


Who pays taxes on cash income?


1. Because of this grey area salary in cash is something extraordinary, in the West at least.

2. There is a cap on how much cash you can use in a transaction, in the West at least.

3. If XMR replaced fiat, ALL transactions would be anonymous.


That is partially a false equivalence.

By many accounts moving around and dealing with large values in cash is inconvenient and cumbersome compared with the relative ease of moving crytpo between holders.

To the point where cartels end up with literal huge piles of money in warehouses and resort to complicated operations to try and move it across borders.


Anyone who doesn’t want to risk jail, at least in the US.


Exactly, that doesn't change with crypto-currencies.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: