There’s a lot to unpack in your claim, and this really hinges on your definition of “effective”.
What do you consider to be effective, and how would you differentiate it from theater?
Right up front, it seems necessary to account for the relative safety of flying if that safety has nothing to do with FAA policies.
It also seems that any safety policy that is effective enough will eventually appear indistinguishable from theater as people become more and more disconnected from the possibility of disaster.
What do you consider to be effective, and how would you differentiate it from theater?
Right up front, it seems necessary to account for the relative safety of flying if that safety has nothing to do with FAA policies.
It also seems that any safety policy that is effective enough will eventually appear indistinguishable from theater as people become more and more disconnected from the possibility of disaster.
Ozone mitigations come immediately to mind.