Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> I spend an inordinate amount of mental energy calculating how we can jump into the property ladder as quickly and safely as possible

You buy a cheap house far away from where you work, and rent it to someone. Let them pay your mortgage and before you know it, you've got enough equity to put towards another house. Rinse and repeat.



This sounds like the kind of high risk gamble that relies on prices continuously going up to work out. It might work out for some and hit it big, or the market can go belly up and leave you in ruin.

I'm also a bit weary of having to manage properties in far flung locations. I rather use a property manager, who would eat into the profits.


> It might work out for some and hit it big, or the market can go belly up and leave you in ruin

No different from living in a house you buy. Except what I recommended is a little safer. If you lose your local job because the local economy collapses, you're now stuck with a house you cannot sell, cannot rent, and that ties you to the area. Ouch!

With a rental far away, if that economy collapses it's already a small mortgage so no big deal. If your local economy collapses, you can move out of your local expensive rental and look for work elsewhere. Or even move into the cheap rental investment you just bought if that economy is doing well. Buying far away spreads your risk and is safer than buying to live in near your work.


It's not high risk. It does not depend on prices going up. It depends on renters paying most or all of your mortgage.

It just runs itself if you get good renters. That's where you put all the time and effort upfront.

Yes it has some risk. All investments do. I answered the question about how you get on the property ladder if you can't afford local prices. There might be other ways too.


Is this path still actually viable for HCOL areas?

I remember having a conversation with a real estate developer in SF in 2021. They said that this used to be the path to owning in places like SF, but that it’s no longer a viable option.


I'd say not right this instant, given interest rates. But if you really want to, look for condos out by, like, American Canyon or Vallejo or similarly far out locations. 20% down for a $300k place is $60k. Which, while being a good chunk of change, isn't as far out of reach as the $200k down payment for a million dollar condo in SF.

Before you do the investment property thing though, make sure being a property manager is truely how you want to spend your life. Investing money into financial instruments is a lot less work these days, what with robo advisors platforms (eg wealthfront, betterment) providing easy places to invest from.


I doubt it. I said "far away" meaning buy in a low cost of living area. Especially one that is popular and growing. Although it's convenient to live in your first property investment, it's not a requirement. Rent near work as cheaply as possible but very likely in a neighborhood where you can't afford to buy. And buy somewhere else.


If you're renting out the house, does it need to be in a HCOL area and does it need to be just one house? It goes against the idea of 'housing as investment being a negative thing' though.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: