Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Lol, this one really fooled me.

I mean, after UpStart, Mir, Unity, I really feel it's only a matter of time till they realize it's pointless to play the not invented here game and just adopt FlatPak.

I think their main reason is trying to get their own intellectual property on the map and to be the gatekeeper for the snap store which could become lucrative when paid apps ever become a thing.

But as with their previous not invented here enterprises, nobody else is interested and they're just wasting money.



I think your definition of NIH differs from mine, on all of those projects. Let's start with Upstart, how was that NIH?


NIH is a cynical name, it means you prefer IH. All this stuff is related to Canonical reinventing stuff, without most other distros adopting it.


Upstart got some decent adoption, with both Debian, Fedora, and RHEL switching to it by default for a short time.

Its downfall was that it didn't offer a great deal of benefits and kept all the downsides of sysvinit. systemd was superior in every way.


Are you suggesting Canonical should have stuck with SysVinit and shouldn't have tried to make systems better?


No they are suggesting the possibility you intentionally excluded, which is to make systems better but by other means.


When Upstart was conceived and first shipped, what other option was there?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: