Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Not true for retirees because Social Security gets inflation adjustments.

Probably not true in general either except in stagflation.



Social Security is about 30% of the income of the elderly according to the SSA.

https://www.ssa.gov/news/press/factsheets/basicfact-alt.pdf


This thread was about pricing in the EU. Even if it was inflation adjusted, it wasn't adjusted for exchange rate differences, which are a significant part of the price increase on Apple products in the EU.


How exactly is it not true for the working mom in my example?


That's stagflation, which happened in the 70s.

Inflation usually means wages going up. Of course they don't all go up at the same time and people get shuffled around, which makes them really angry.

But low wage workers in the US have gotten significant pay raises since 2019. In fact, they're the only workers who are making more after inflation.

https://bcf.princeton.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Combine...

…This also means wealth and income inequality are down, which maybe people will be happy about.


This isn't a contradiction of my example. My example is pretty clear: Mom makes X before/after prices have gone up, and years after so.

> Inflation usually means wages going up.

Inflation is a rise in prices, that's what it means. Maybe I am being pedantic about your use of "means".

> But low wage workers in the US have gotten significant pay raises since 2019.

Mom in my example hasn't, so irrelevant. Why do you insist on using generalizations to try to contradict an example? My example is very real, the generalization does not apply.


Maybe you should help her find a better job.

> Inflation is a rise in prices, that's what it means. Maybe I am being pedantic about your use of "means".

Wages are a price for labor, so prices going up includes wages.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: