Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Is that correct? I would think that, even with NOT NULL Boolean field, the physical table has three kinds of rows: those with a true value, those with a false value, and those no longer in the table (with either true or false, but that doesn’t matter)

If so, you can’t, in general, efficiently find the false rows if you know which rows have true or vice versa.

You also can only use an index on rows with true values to efficiently find those with other values if the index can return the true rows in order (so that you can use the logic “there’s a gap in the index ⇒ there are non-true values in that gap)



Yeah that seems more like how it would work, I’m curious about the internals there




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: