I'm quite the serverless skeptic, but honestly this sounds quite appealing.
I particularly like the definition of serverless given at the beginning of this post. It's refreshingly straightforward and realistic, without the marketing BS that the cloud providers tend to give.
I've always felt like developing for serverless hosting is like writing a plugin for a piece of closed-source software, and that sucks from a dev experience and lock-in point of view. Doing for serverless what CGI did back in the day seems like a good idea, and containers/WASM seem like good options for it at the moment.
I particularly like the definition of serverless given at the beginning of this post. It's refreshingly straightforward and realistic, without the marketing BS that the cloud providers tend to give.
I've always felt like developing for serverless hosting is like writing a plugin for a piece of closed-source software, and that sucks from a dev experience and lock-in point of view. Doing for serverless what CGI did back in the day seems like a good idea, and containers/WASM seem like good options for it at the moment.