Kinda. Meta and Twitter want you to join their platforms, they aren't general purpose search engines scraping the entire Internet - they're scraping people that join them. Requests from Meta/Twitter are probably from a link someone put in a post.
ChatGPT can't be an impolite Internet citizen (spoofing UA's) and claim to be using AI for the good for humanity, so they're not going to be dishonest with their user-agent.
> ChatGPT can't be an impolite Internet citizen (spoofing UA's) and claim to be using AI for the good for humanity, so they're not going to be dishonest with their user-agent.
That reads an awful-lot like "Google can't be evil and claim that their motto is 'Don't be evil', so they're not going to be evil" but here we are. The profit motive eventually undoes any principled claim by a company.
Absolutely, but until then, adding bot UA's to a blocklist is somewhat useful.
Like anything else in IT security it's never "set and forget" permanently; the effectiveness of things like that decay over time and must be periodically re-evaluated.
But if something can be used to your advantage now, even if for a while, then why not use it.