No, the assertion being made is that there are mundane possibilities for each of those values that have not been ruled out by the data/video we have.
To make the extraordinary claim more plausible, you have to rule out the more mundane possibilities. Prove it's doing something unusual. Until then, "we can't prove it either way" doesn't mean there's a 50/50 chance.
The people fighting for those recordings at this point have seen reasonable explanations and dismissed them
It's like the Flat Earth documentary where a group crowdfunds an absurd laser and, when it demonstrates the Earth's curvature, reason that they need to "troubleshoot" that 'flawed' result.
