Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The benefit, in the eyes of leadership, might be that the consultants/devs are easier to replace which reduces risk.


Why is a no code dev easier to replace than a code dev?


No code devs surely won't take that much time to deliver something as code devs.

No code devs surely don't need that much expertise (it's no code), so surely they are not as expensive as code devs.

Earlier this week Jack from backoffice asked me if there are any positions in my eng team. I wonder if he can learn no code in a week, since it surely won't be that complex...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: