Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I wonder if Windows 8 will be the death of the Windows platform. Horrible Desktop experience, great Tablet experience but no apps.

But if Windows dies, what then can replace it? Will we see another XP, except one that goes unreplaced? Microsoft making a U-Turn?

Or possibly, another Operating System? Android? Chrome OS? Ubuntu?

Whatever happens, Windows 8, its launch, and aftermath will certainly be interesting, "good" or not.



People have always complained about new versions of Windows. They bitch and moan and they cry and vouch never to touch it, but in the end, it does not matter.

Most people buy a new PC every few years and it comes with some sort of OS and it looks different every time. Whether that was XP or Vista or 7 or 8, they won't know. And consequently, we can complain all we want, but if it comes pre-installed and IT departments like it, it will work.

Don't get me wrong, Microsoft will die eventually (just like we all do), but it will be a gradual, less painful process. Maybe this is one of their last serious stabs at something exciting. But they will die of obscurity, not concrete failure.


That was then. This is now.

There are real alternatives today, including not upgrading. Microsoft may come to regret making Windows 7 as solid as it is.


Not upgrading is always an immediate option. You think Windows 7 will still look great 5 years from now? 10 years?


XP has looked like shit for years already but people still cling to it like a tree in a hurricane.

Ten years is way too far in the future to place any bets.


As one data point I was always the next upgrade until about 2006 or so when budget PC's hit a point that they would do everything I wanted as fast as I wanted. I mainly use a mac now, but my PC is probably 5 years+ old and does everything as fast as I would need.


Not upgrading is an option if there aren't really critical issues. "looking great" is not one of them - only being compatible with multiple must-have applications would do it.

WinXP + IE6 is still an option and it has been 10+ years already. If windows 8-9-10 sucks, then win7 can easily carry on for as long as hardware manufacturers keep shipping compatible drivers; and if windows 8-9-10 sucks, then they can easily do it for dozens of years.


That's not strictly true. People generally skip every other version of windows because somehow every other version sucks.


Right, but that does not imply a move away from Windows in general. People 'update' whenever they buy a new machine or the IT department makes them update. Whether or not they skip a version or two does not kill Microsoft immediately but it does not save them either.

I guess what I was trying to say was that Microsoft seems to be losing right now and they might just die in the somewhat near future. However, this will not be the direct consequence of a bad version of Windows or of people skipping a version. We have seen that before. People always complain about change, especially about changes in something they don't understand but have to use anyways. So people complaining about a new version of Windows is not interesting.


Oh I agree with that. If Vista didn't kill them (or even hurt them, really) I can't imagine this will either.


I do think Windows will seriously decline because of Windows 8, especially when you take into account all the other devices that now run Android or iOS. "PC's" or not, the fact remains that people are spending a lot of time on those "other" devices now, and as for what will replace it, I think a combination of all of those.

I see Ubuntu becoming more popular and more consumerized, with popular games arriving for it. I see ChromeOS and Android gaining a bit of laptop market share. I see Macs gaining more market share, too. Governments and enterprises will increasingly use Linux or cloud alternatives.

The point is, Windows will not have the monopoly it had for 15 years, and that's a great thing. We've been waiting for that for a very long time.


Yes, but because native applications are here to stay, so it would seem, developers are in for a world of pain: writing your software for multiple incompatible platforms. This has been going on since iOS/Android at least, but it won't get any better soon.


Well, at least Windows 8 embraces HTML5 as a platform. They also have a new set of "Windows Runtime" (WinRT, not to be confused with Windows RT) APIs, which are consistent across all languages you can use to develop applications for it. Even JavaScript.


Or the pain of having to deal with HTML, JavaScript and CSS working the same way across multiple browsers and OS.

I'll take native development any day.


>I wonder if Windows 8 will be the death of the Windows platform

tl;dr: no.

I see this as another instance of the Windows Rule in effect: Skip every other release.

I will say I'm in the minority of people that likes the way Metro looks and acts even on the desktop. They'll get more apps come release time. Keep in mind, what we've all played with isn't even beta quality software.


>They'll get more apps come release time.

You sure? They've had the Developer and Consumer preview out, yet they still have a practically empty store, and have been literally handing out checks to try and fill it.


Pretty sure. Personally, I'd be very, very wary of developing an app to target a pre-beta operating system.


x86 windows 8 tablets will probably be fantastic, provided that the Atom processors are any good. They'll have both the great experience and apps.


> provided that the Atom processors are any good

Intel's halfassed efforts with the Atom really FUBAR'd the netbook. What a dog those computers are. The initial rabid enthusiasm that people had for Netbooks just set them up for a bad experience, which reinforced their prejudices against PCs predisposed them to flee to lag-free experiences like the iPad.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: